By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Several immigrants who fled authoritarian regimes expressed alarm at tactics employed during the Trump administration, finding parallels to their home countries’ oppressive practices. These included aggressive questioning and phone searches at borders, reminiscent of the surveillance and intimidation they experienced abroad. Conversely, some immigrants, such as Lily Tang Williams, felt the Biden administration’s actions, particularly regarding censorship, were more reminiscent of authoritarian tactics. Concerns extended to academia, with professors fearing self-censorship due to potential repercussions from the administration’s actions. The targeting of news organizations further mirrored tactics used by authoritarian leaders in other nations.
Read the original article here
People who fled authoritarian regimes often find themselves unnerved by certain political tactics, particularly those reminiscent of the oppressive systems they escaped. The comparison isn’t about a perfect mirroring of historical events, but rather a troubling echo of familiar patterns of power consolidation and the erosion of democratic norms. It’s the systematic undermining of institutions, the weaponization of government machinery against perceived enemies, and the chilling effect on dissent that resonates deeply with their past experiences.
The similarities aren’t always overt; they’re often subtle, insidious shifts in the balance of power. It’s the gradual dismantling of checks and balances, the blurring of lines between government and personal interests, and the increasingly blatant disregard for established legal processes that raise alarm bells. These actions, while seemingly legal on the surface, have a cumulative effect, slowly suffocating the lifeblood of a truly democratic society.
For individuals who have lived under authoritarian rule, the subtle erosion of democratic institutions is alarmingly familiar. They’ve witnessed firsthand how seemingly small steps—the silencing of dissenting voices, the manipulation of information, the selective enforcement of laws—can lead to a complete collapse of freedom and the establishment of unchecked power. The fear isn’t just about overt violence or imprisonment, it’s the pervasive sense of unease and uncertainty, the knowledge that basic rights are no longer guaranteed, that resonates so strongly.
The experience is often compounded by the feeling of betrayal. For those who sought refuge in the United States believing in the promise of freedom and democracy, seeing similar tactics employed here can be deeply disillusioning and even traumatic. It’s a painful reminder of the precariousness of freedom and the constant vigilance required to safeguard it. The hope for a safe haven can quickly turn to fear, as familiar warning signs appear in an unexpected place.
It’s important to understand that the comparison isn’t always about a direct equivalence to historical atrocities like Nazism, but rather a broader pattern of authoritarian tendencies. This involves the exploitation of existing societal divisions, the use of propaganda and disinformation to manipulate public opinion, the suppression of dissent, and the erosion of independent institutions. These are tactics used across numerous authoritarian regimes, regardless of their specific ideological framing, and their presence should be seen as a critical warning sign.
Furthermore, the perceived apathy or even support for such tactics among certain segments of the population is deeply troubling. The willingness to overlook or even celebrate actions that undermine democratic principles is not only perplexing, but fuels the very trends that cause concern. It raises questions about the strength of democratic values within society and the ability of the system to resist such pressures.
The economic consequences of these actions add another layer of complexity. The instability caused by such policies can create conditions ripe for authoritarian rule, a pattern seen throughout history. Economic hardship and uncertainty can make populations more susceptible to populist appeals and strongman tactics, creating a vicious cycle of decline.
Ultimately, the concerns raised by those who have experienced authoritarianism are not mere partisan complaints. They are rooted in a deep understanding of the subtle yet dangerous mechanisms used to dismantle democratic systems. These concerns should be taken seriously and not dismissed as hyperbole or misplaced nostalgia. The echoes of the past should serve as a potent warning about the fragility of freedom and the importance of constant vigilance in protecting it. The very real fear of sliding towards a new reality, where basic rights and freedoms are no longer guaranteed, underpins these concerns. Ignoring these warnings risks a descent into a dark place which many have already escaped, only to find the shadow of it following them into a new land.