By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following a neo-Nazi demonstration in February, an independent investigation by 21CP Solutions yielded recommendations for law enforcement changes. The report, which included reviewing body camera footage and interviewing officers and community members, suggested potential minor charges against the demonstrators for violating Ohio code regarding public infrastructure. While the investigation found no violations related to hate speech or firearm laws, significant community distrust remains, as evidenced by emotional responses at the press conference announcing the findings. The report recommends eight key changes for Evendale Police and the Hamilton County Sheriff’s Office, focusing on training, policy updates, and improved inter-agency communication. The Hamilton County Prosecutor will determine whether charges are filed against either the demonstrators or community members involved in subsequent events.
Read the original article here
The investigation into the Evendale police response to the neo-Nazi demonstration in February revealed a deeply troubling picture. The report, conducted by 21CP Solutions, concluded that the police response was inadequate and, in some instances, appeared to show a level of cooperation with the demonstrators that raised serious concerns.
The investigation found evidence suggesting a troubling familiarity between some on-duty police officers and off-duty officers who participated in the demonstration. Anecdotal accounts from the event paint a picture of casual interactions, bordering on camaraderie, between uniformed officers and the masked neo-Nazis. One account details a conversation between two officers, one on duty and one apparently participating in the demonstration, discussing personal matters and even the on-duty officer’s pending overtime pay. This raises serious questions about potential conflicts of interest and a lack of appropriate professional conduct.
The report also highlighted the police department’s disproportionate focus on addressing concerns from residents disturbed by the demonstration, rather than taking decisive action against the neo-Nazis themselves. The investigation indicated that police prioritized addressing complaints from neighbors over actively confronting the illegal demonstration. This suggests a misplaced prioritization of public order concerns over dealing decisively with the hateful ideologies on display.
Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of the investigation centered around the assistance provided to at least one neo-Nazi. Apparently, a police officer escorted a demonstrator who had forgotten something back to the scene of the demonstration. While the report cited this act as being for the individual’s “protection,” it casts a shadow on the police department’s commitment to upholding the law fairly and impartially. The act seems to contradict the notion of neutral law enforcement and raises questions about selective enforcement.
The body camera footage, referenced in several discussions surrounding the incident, reportedly supports the claim of friendly interactions between police officers and neo-Nazis. This visual evidence, while not explicitly detailed in the report itself, adds weight to concerns about a lack of robust police intervention against the demonstrably illegal activity.
The investigation’s conclusion, which stated the police department had done nothing wrong, is jarring in light of the evidence. Such a conclusion appears to minimize the seriousness of the issues uncovered. The investigation itself was met with significant criticism, notably for its selection of 21CP Solutions, a consulting firm whose name sparked questions regarding potential biases and the lack of objectivity in the chosen investigative body. The lack of a more independent and impartial review process contributes to a lack of public trust.
Furthermore, the report’s seemingly lenient findings have sparked outrage among community members, who rightly question the adequacy of the police response. The fact that charges were suggested against community members who tried to actively intervene and disperse the neo-Nazi demonstration, while the officers who showed apparent leniency remained unaccountable, further fuels public anger. The situation highlights a stark imbalance in the application of the law and casts doubt on the impartiality of the police force.
The entire incident highlights the crucial need for transparent and independent investigations into police conduct, especially when dealing with sensitive situations involving hate groups and demonstrably illegal activities. The Evendale police response to this neo-Nazi demonstration serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of complacency, selective enforcement, and the urgent need for accountability within law enforcement agencies. The lack of meaningful consequences for the observed behavior leaves many concerned about future responses to similar events and the potential for tacit approval of hateful ideologies within the law enforcement community. The report’s findings, or rather, the lack of substantial reprimand, has done little to alleviate the justified concerns of the public and raises serious questions about the future safety and well-being of the Evendale community.