By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The European Commission launched an investigation into Pornhub, Stripchat, XNXX, and XVideos under the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA) for insufficient age verification measures. The Commission alleges the platforms’ one-click self-declarations are ineffective in preventing minors from accessing adult content. Potential penalties include fines up to 6% of global annual turnover if the platforms fail to implement effective age verification. While Stripchat’s designation as a “very large online platform” was revoked, the investigation into its age verification practices continues. The Commission emphasized its commitment to swift action depending on the platforms’ response.
Read the original article here
Pornhub and three other adult websites are currently facing an EU child safety investigation. The European Commission alleges that these platforms’ verification systems are insufficient in preventing underage individuals from accessing their content. This raises questions about the responsibility for ensuring children’s online safety: is it the platforms’ obligation, or does it primarily fall on parents?
The argument that parents should be solely responsible for monitoring their children’s internet usage is frequently raised. This perspective draws parallels to other safety concerns, such as toddlers playing in traffic; car manufacturers take safety measures, but ultimately, parental supervision is paramount. Applying this logic to online adult content suggests that platforms have limited control over intentional access by minors. The difficulty lies in finding a balance: preventing underage access without excessively restricting legitimate adult users, a challenge akin to building a “toddler fence” around every road.
However, the argument that children will always find a way to access prohibited content, regardless of platform regulations, is valid. The internet, with its various search engines and readily available information, provides multiple avenues for accessing explicit material, even without dedicated adult websites. The ease with which information can be found—from simple Google searches to more obscure methods—highlights the inherent difficulty in completely blocking access for determined minors. This situation parallels past experiences where finding pornography required more effort, but still happened.
Concerns regarding data collection and potential overreach by authorities are also voiced. Mandating strict age verification on adult websites could lead to increased data collection by platforms and potentially governments. The existing trend towards linking online accounts to personal information—as seen with platforms like Reddit—raises privacy concerns. The implication is that any age verification system could serve as a gateway to broader surveillance, possibly exceeding the intended purpose of child safety. Such measures could also potentially disproportionately impact those who already operate in a less regulated space.
Furthermore, the effectiveness of age verification systems remains questionable. Many suggest that methods like credit card verification are easily circumvented. The potential for technological advancements—particularly in AI-generated content—suggests that any measures implemented today might quickly become obsolete. The cat and mouse game between those seeking to access content and those attempting to restrict it seems destined to continue, potentially leaving authorities perpetually playing catch-up. The concern is that the focus on adult content providers deflects attention from broader issues, such as the prevalence of inappropriate content across various platforms.
The debate also touches on the broader issue of online content regulation. The existence of content rating systems for games and videos raises the question of why a similar standard couldn’t be applied to websites. This could potentially involve metadata tagging and client-side checks, allowing parental control tools on devices to manage access based on those ratings. However, the complexity of implementing and enforcing such a system on a global scale presents considerable challenges. The problem appears to be a lack of specific, universally accepted and easy to implement verification method.
In conclusion, while the EU’s investigation into Pornhub and other adult websites aims to protect children, the effectiveness and potential unintended consequences of such regulations remain highly debatable. The inherent difficulties of preventing determined minors from accessing online content, coupled with concerns over data privacy and the ongoing technological arms race, suggest that a multi-pronged approach—incorporating parental responsibility, comprehensive digital literacy education, and addressing the broader problem of harmful online content—is likely needed rather than solely focusing on restricting access to specific adult websites. The possibility that this focus is a distraction from other more pressing issues is also a major consideration.