By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The 90-day trade truce between the U.S. and China is being hailed as a victory in China, with officials and state media emphasizing the effectiveness of Beijing’s assertive negotiating stance. This strategy is credited with securing a deal that significantly reduced U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods from 145% to 30%, in exchange for a reduction in Chinese tariffs on U.S. goods. The agreement, celebrated widely on Chinese social media, showcases a perceived triumph of Beijing’s firm countermeasures. This positive reception highlights the impact of the reduced tariffs and underscores the narrative of Chinese success in the trade negotiations.
Read the original article here
China views the recent trade agreement with the United States as a significant victory for Beijing. The perception stems from the fact that the initial aggressive tariff strategy employed by the U.S. ultimately yielded minimal concessions from China.
The U.S.’s attempt to impose exceedingly high tariffs on Chinese imports was ultimately unsuccessful, perceived as a bluff that was easily called by the Chinese government. The timing of the U.S.’s announcement to lower tariffs, coinciding with a period of zero container ships departing China for U.S. ports, further supports this view.
The resulting agreement, characterized by some as merely a temporary tariff reduction, falls far short of the significant changes in Chinese trade practices originally sought by the U.S. China appears to have achieved its goal of avoiding major concessions while successfully mitigating the impact of the initially proposed tariffs.
This outcome is interpreted as a strategic win for China, highlighting the perceived lack of leverage the U.S. held in the negotiation. It is seen as evidence that China was able to withstand pressure from the U.S. without making significant compromises. The U.S. is viewed as having backed down, essentially conceding to China’s position.
From a Chinese perspective, the whole process resembles a classic negotiation tactic, where the U.S. made an initially aggressive demand, only to eventually settle for a less favorable outcome for themselves. This leaves China with the impression that they successfully navigated a high-stakes negotiation while preserving their economic interests.
The lack of substantive changes in Chinese export practices, such as the continued restriction on the export of rare-earth minerals, underscores this perspective. The perceived “deal” is thus seen as a significant win, primarily because it allowed China to weather the trade storm without sacrificing crucial economic objectives.
The fact that the U.S. lowered tariffs without securing reciprocal concessions further reinforces this interpretation. The 30% tariff, viewed as a relatively minor increase from previous levels, is considered a manageable cost for China, especially when compared to the potential losses associated with prolonged trade tensions.
In essence, the relatively low impact of the tariffs on China’s economy, coupled with the lack of meaningful concessions from the Chinese side, makes the “deal” appear as a decisive victory from Beijing’s standpoint. The absence of concrete achievements on the U.S. side further strengthens this perception.
While some argue the agreement offers temporary relief and does not fully resolve underlying trade imbalances, this point is often sidelined by the Chinese interpretation of the events as a demonstration of their negotiating prowess and resilience. The perception is that the U.S. ultimately blinked first, leading to a successful defensive strategy by China.
This interpretation is further fueled by the ongoing issues like China’s continued limitations on the import of certain American goods, such as soybeans and pork, which reinforces the narrative of a relatively minor concession by China. The continuation of those restrictions, despite the lowered tariffs, suggests that China did not compromise on key economic objectives.
Therefore, irrespective of whether the agreement constitutes a substantial long-term win, the immediate perception within China is one of a strategic victory. The narrative emphasizes China’s ability to withstand U.S. pressure, its successful negotiation tactics, and its preservation of key economic interests throughout the process. In conclusion, regardless of any objective measures, the perception remains firmly entrenched in China, solidifying the notion of this trade agreement as a major win for Beijing.