By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Young American men are increasingly converting to Russian Orthodox Christianity, drawn to its emphasis on traditional masculinity and family values. This surge in converts, particularly noticeable in Texas, is linked to dissatisfaction with modern American culture and a perceived lack of male identity in contemporary society. The Russian Orthodox Church’s conservative stance on gender roles, family structure, and societal norms resonates with many seeking a counter-cultural alternative. This growth is amplified by online presence and outreach, contrasting with the relatively small size of the Orthodox community within the broader American religious landscape.
Read the original article here
Young US men are joining Russian Orthodox churches, apparently drawn by promises of achieving an “absurd level of manliness.” This notion, however, seems wildly misplaced, with many commentators expressing incredulity and amusement at the very idea. The perceived lack of masculinity seems to be driving these young men to seek guidance in unexpected places, prompting questions about the state of masculinity in modern American society.
The irony isn’t lost on anyone; readily available alternatives to this seemingly desperate search for virility exist. A simple trip to a local boxing gym, for instance, offers the opportunity for physical challenge and a far more direct route to building strength and confidence than joining a foreign religious organization.
The whole situation is seen as deeply problematic, highlighting a significant vulnerability among young men. This vulnerability is further exacerbated by the apparent lack of positive male role models and a healthy understanding of masculinity. The appeal of these churches, some argue, is rooted in a profound insecurity and a misguided notion of what constitutes true manliness.
The activities and teachings being highlighted are equally perplexing. What exactly is this “absurd level of manliness” that these churches supposedly offer? The comments suggest it might involve a peculiar set of rules and restrictions, seemingly designed to enforce hyper-masculinity and simultaneously avoid anything perceived as feminine. This seemingly includes activities as harmless as eating soup, a practice that some in this context view as inappropriately effeminate.
The comparison to manipulative online influencers like Andrew Tate is frequent. This echoes concerns that the churches are exploiting insecurities and offering a warped sense of identity rather than genuine spiritual guidance. Such exploitation is deemed particularly insidious, given the susceptible age group being targeted. The lack of interest in more established religious institutions like the Roman Catholic Church also raises questions about the motivations behind this trend.
Underlying the mockery and criticism is a genuine concern for these young men. The comments suggest a belief that society has failed to adequately raise and guide young men, resulting in a generation grappling with identity and self-esteem issues. The contrasting upbringing of girls, noted for often fostering greater responsibility and a wider skillset, is highlighted as a possible contributing factor. This suggests the need for a more balanced and holistic approach to raising boys and creating a healthier definition of masculinity.
A prevailing sentiment is that true manliness doesn’t stem from external validation or rigid adherence to arbitrary rules. Instead, it’s seen as a matter of self-confidence, genuine strength, and respect for others. The act of seeking validation from an outside source, rather than developing it intrinsically, is considered the antithesis of manliness. This perspective emphasizes the critical need for self-reflection and self-acceptance rather than relying on external validation or imposing restrictive definitions of masculinity.
There’s also a strong undercurrent of skepticism surrounding the authenticity of these churches’ motives. Some speculate that this phenomenon might be a form of targeted influence campaign, possibly with links to Russian interests. This suspicion is fueled by the alignment with known elements associated with Russian propaganda and the potential for political manipulation.
The comments consistently point out the absurdity of the situation. The whole issue is considered ironic, given the perceived lack of genuine manliness in the very concept of seeking it from a source that promotes such restrictive and arguably outdated views. The underlying concern is about a vulnerable segment of the population, easily influenced and misled into a false sense of belonging and purpose. The overall tone is one of disbelief, amusement, and concern, intermingled with a desire to help these young men find healthier and more constructive paths towards self-improvement and personal growth. The final verdict is unanimous: This pursuit of “manliness” is not only misguided but potentially harmful.