By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During a three-day state visit to Malaysia, President Xi Jinping reaffirmed China’s commitment to supporting Malaysia and other Asian nations against unilateralism and protectionism. This pledge comes amidst concerns over the impact of U.S. tariffs on the regional economy. Xi’s visit, his first to Malaysia since 2013, highlighted the strengthening relationship between the two countries. The emphasis on countering protectionist policies underscores China’s role in the region’s economic landscape.
Read the original article here
Xi Jinping’s recent assertion that China will stand with its Asian counterparts to combat unilateralism presents a complex picture. His statement, delivered during a state visit to Malaysia, framed this opposition to unilateralism as a collective effort to safeguard the prosperity of the “Asian family.” This carefully crafted narrative underscores a strategic shift in how China positions itself within the region.
The timing of Xi’s statement, coinciding with ongoing trade tensions and the legacy of protectionist policies from previous administrations, is significant. It’s a direct response to the perception of economic instability caused by protectionist measures, positioning China as a proponent of multilateral cooperation and a counterbalance to such policies. This is not merely rhetoric; China’s signing of numerous agreements with Malaysia during the visit underlines their commitment to expanding economic ties and fostering closer relations within the region.
However, the claim of standing against unilateralism needs to be viewed through a critical lens. China’s actions in the South China Sea, its assertive stance towards Taiwan, and its relationship with other regional powers paint a more nuanced picture. The rhetoric of combating unilateralism can be easily interpreted as a thinly veiled attempt to consolidate China’s influence and project its own form of regional hegemony. While advocating for multilateralism, China’s actions sometimes appear to contradict this principle.
The simultaneous pursuit of economic partnerships with a multitude of Asian nations suggests a sophisticated strategy to expand China’s economic and political influence. By presenting itself as a champion of multilateralism and opposing protectionist tendencies, China hopes to attract support and weaken the influence of rival powers. This is particularly relevant in a geopolitical climate marked by shifting alliances and competition between global powers.
While the statement might sound appealing to nations seeking to reduce their reliance on traditional partners, concerns remain about the implications of increased Chinese economic dominance. The fear of potential coercion through economic leverage is a real concern for many smaller nations. The perception of China as a benevolent partner should be tempered by a realistic assessment of its political ambitions and the long-term implications of economic dependence.
The statement about combating unilateralism and protectionism must be viewed within the context of China’s broader foreign policy objectives. It’s a strategic move designed to improve its image on the global stage and potentially draw countries away from alliances seen as adversarial to China’s interests. The emphasis on regional cooperation highlights a desire to shape the narrative surrounding its role in Asia and to present itself as a reliable and influential partner.
Nevertheless, the very notion of “the Asian family” promoted by Xi’s speech raises questions. Is this genuinely a collaborative effort based on mutual respect and shared interests, or a thinly veiled attempt to create a sphere of influence dominated by China? This question is critical, as the balance of power in the region shifts. A focus solely on China’s stated intentions, without evaluating its actual actions, risks ignoring the potential for future conflict.
Ultimately, while Xi’s message promotes regional unity and the rejection of unilateralism, it remains crucial to examine this from a perspective that acknowledges China’s own potentially unilateral actions and the complexities of the geopolitical landscape. The long-term impact of China’s engagement in Asia, and the implications for the broader global order, will only become clearer with time. Xi’s declaration, therefore, should be understood as a strategic manoeuvre within a larger power play, rather than a simple condemnation of unilateralism. The true test will lie not in words, but in actions.