By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Susan Crawford secured a victory in the Wisconsin Supreme Court race, maintaining a liberal 4-3 majority and defying Elon Musk’s multi-million dollar campaign against her. The intensely competitive race, the most expensive state Supreme Court election in U.S. history, saw Democrats successfully frame Musk as the antagonist, contrasting his influence with Crawford’s commitment to justice. This win ensures liberal control over upcoming crucial cases concerning abortion rights, collective bargaining, and redistricting. The outcome also marks a setback for Donald Trump, who endorsed Crawford’s opponent.
Read the original article here
Susan Crawford’s victory in the Wisconsin Supreme Court race is a resounding win for democracy, a triumphant rejection of the influence of massive wealth in politics, and a particularly satisfying defeat for Elon Musk. The sheer volume of money poured into this race – nearly $100 million – underscores just how significant this win truly is. It’s a stark reminder that even staggering sums of money can’t always buy an election, a point hammered home by the considerable margin of Crawford’s victory. This win feels especially sweet given the pervasive negativity surrounding recent elections.
The triumph in Wisconsin stands as a powerful symbol of resistance against the intrusion of big money into our political system. It’s a clear message to oligarchs everywhere that their vast fortunes don’t grant them unchecked power over the democratic process. The overwhelming sentiment expressed is one of deep satisfaction, not only for the result itself, but also for the symbolic victory it represents in the fight against undue influence.
Many see Musk’s substantial investment in this race as a colossal failure, a testament to the fact that even the immense resources at his disposal couldn’t guarantee a win. The schadenfreude surrounding this defeat is palpable, with many expressing a gleeful sense of justice served. The scale of his investment, millions of dollars poured into a state Supreme Court race, is staggering and highlights the worrying trend of ultra-wealthy individuals wielding disproportionate influence on elections.
The victory is not just significant for Wisconsin; it resonates across the nation as a potential turning point. It suggests a growing weariness with the pervasive influence of big money in politics and signals that voters are increasingly willing to push back against such interference. It’s a powerful message, and one that resonates particularly strongly amongst those who feel disenfranchised by the dominance of wealth in politics.
The win also demonstrates a remarkable grassroots mobilization. The sheer volume of engagement and commentary surrounding the race points to a mobilized electorate, actively involved in pushing back against the perceived intrusion of Musk’s influence. It serves as an example of what can be achieved when voters engage actively and refuse to be swayed by external forces.
The outcome sparks conversations about the future of political influence and the potential for similar victories in upcoming elections. It inspires a renewed call to action, encouraging people to get involved in their local political parties and work towards reforming campaign finance laws. Many see this win as the first step in a long fight to reclaim democracy from the influence of unchecked wealth and corporate power.
Beyond the political ramifications, the emotional response to Crawford’s victory is striking. Many express feelings of relief, joy, and even vindication. This response transcends mere political affiliation, tapping into a broader sense of hope and a renewed belief in the power of the people to overcome seemingly insurmountable odds. The sheer level of emotional investment in this race points to a deeper dissatisfaction with the current political climate and a yearning for change.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court race isn’t just a local election; it’s become a national symbol of resistance, a powerful statement against the corrupting influence of extreme wealth in politics. The victory for Crawford isn’t just a win for her, it’s a victory for anyone who believes in fair elections and the power of the people to resist the influence of money. It’s a resounding “fuck you” to those who believe they can buy democracy, a powerful testament to the enduring strength of the American electorate, and a promising indication of the direction things may be headed.
The aftermath of the election is likely to be just as interesting as the election itself. Predictions range from Musk doubling down on his efforts to further entrench himself within the Republican party, to a growing rift between him and the GOP. Ultimately, Crawford’s win, however momentous, only represents one battle in the larger war for fair elections and against the undue influence of money in politics. The fight will continue, but this particular win certainly feels like a huge step in the right direction.