By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a recent interview, US Vice President JD Vance urged European nations to exhibit greater independence from the United States, critiquing their historical role as “vassals.” He specifically cited the Iraq War, suggesting stronger European opposition could have prevented the conflict’s negative consequences. While acknowledging some European nations correctly opposed the war, Vance believes a more robust, unified stance would have been beneficial. This call for greater European autonomy follows previous criticisms of European defense spending and immigration policies.
Read the original article here
JD Vance’s suggestion that Europe should have done more to prevent the Iraq War is a remarkably audacious claim, given the context of the conflict. The very notion that European nations bear significant responsibility for a war initiated by the United States under false pretenses is deeply problematic. It ignores the overwhelming global opposition to the war, including massive protests worldwide, which demonstrated the widespread understanding that the invasion was based on fabricated justifications regarding weapons of mass destruction.
The statement also conveniently overlooks the fact that the US administration, under George W. Bush, aggressively pursued the war despite significant international skepticism and dissent. This aggressive approach, characterized by the infamous “You’re either with us or against us” ultimatum, effectively silenced meaningful opposition from allies and fueled resentment around the world. The idea that European nations should have somehow unilaterally stopped the US from invading Iraq, given the power dynamics at play, is simply unrealistic.
Furthermore, this argument ignores the considerable domestic opposition to the war within the United States itself. Many US citizens and politicians voiced strong concerns and actively protested against the invasion, highlighting the fact that the responsibility for the conflict was not solely external. The vote in Congress, while showing some support, also revealed significant opposition, illustrating a divided opinion within the United States itself.
The suggestion that Europe bears some responsibility for the Iraq War is akin to blaming a bystander for a crime committed by the perpetrator. The US government, by fabricating the pretext of weapons of mass destruction and ignoring the warnings of experts like Hans Blix, holds primary responsibility for this devastating war. Shifting the blame to Europe, particularly given the widespread international condemnation of the war, reveals a disturbing attempt to deflect accountability.
One cannot ignore the irony of this accusation. The United States, enraged by France’s opposition to the war, even resorted to renaming French fries “freedom fries.” This childish response only further underscores the US administration’s unwillingness to consider alternative perspectives or accept criticism. To now turn around and blame Europe for the war is not only illogical but also deeply insulting.
The underlying implication in Vance’s statement, that Europe should have acted more forcefully to restrain the US government, is potentially dangerous. It suggests a willingness to disregard international sovereignty and norms. International relations are inherently complex; a simple solution like the one proposed would not have resolved the issue and ignores the power dynamics at play. Such an assertion disregards the delicate balance of power and the potential for further conflict if alliances were challenged in such a manner.
It’s tempting to dismiss Vance’s statement as simple provocation or even gaslighting. It certainly seems designed to deflect criticism and generate outrage. The blatant disregard for the historical context of the war, the sheer volume of opposition to it, and the US’s own internal debates are simply ignored in his argument.
Ultimately, JD Vance’s assertion falls flat. The Iraq War was primarily the responsibility of the United States government, and attempts to shift blame to Europe are not only inaccurate but also deeply misleading and inappropriate. A more honest reflection on the war requires acknowledging the US’s flawed decision-making and the significant role played by the US in initiating and escalating the conflict. The suggestion to blame Europe is a convenient and simplistic way to avoid confronting the complicated truths behind this disastrous war.