By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Swiss Foundation for Mine Action (FSD) reports that over 70% of accessible Ukrainian land is now clear of mines and explosive remnants of war, thanks to their efforts and those of partner organizations. This success, encompassing nearly 35,000 km² cleared by the end of last year, has returned thousands of hectares to productive use. The FSD is further enhancing demining efforts by testing a new drone with ground-penetrating radar. International collaboration, including a planned Geneva workshop with Ukrainian officials and donors, will continue to address the long-term challenge of complete mine clearance in Ukraine.
Read the original article here
Over 70% of accessible land in Ukraine has reportedly been cleared of mines. This sounds incredibly positive, a massive achievement in the face of the ongoing conflict and the sheer scale of the problem. But, like many things during wartime, the specifics are a little hazy and require some critical thinking. The claim itself needs context: 70% of *what* exactly has been cleared? It’s crucial to understand that this likely doesn’t represent 70% of all Ukrainian land.
The number likely refers to accessible, Ukrainian-controlled territory, which could still constitute a significant, yet far smaller, percentage of the total land area of the country. We need to consider that a substantial portion of Ukraine remains occupied, meaning significant areas, potentially heavily mined, are simply unreachable for demining operations at this time.
The sheer scale of the minefield is staggering. Reports estimate over 175,000 square kilometers of Ukrainian land potentially contaminated with mines, planted by both sides of the conflict, with neither side likely offering precise locations of their minefields. This makes the demining task a colossal undertaking, a generational project rather than something achievable quickly. In fact, one could argue that it may take several generations to ensure complete mine clearance, with the legacy of this war likely affecting agricultural practices and land use for decades to come.
The difficulty is further compounded by the fact that the information available is often fragmented and lacks complete transparency. While the announced 70% figure suggests significant progress, without precise details about the methodology and the definition of “accessible land,” it’s challenging to fully evaluate the success of the demining efforts. The stated figure of 35,000 square kilometers demined might sound impressive, but within the context of the vast expanse of potentially contaminated land, it represents only a fraction of the overall challenge.
Moreover, the dangers extend beyond simply the physical presence of the mines. The psychological impact is substantial, affecting the well-being of the population and hindering agricultural production in affected areas. Farmers returning to their fields face immense risk, and the threat of accidental detonations remains a persistent concern even with demining efforts underway.
The experience of other countries grappling with the aftermath of conflicts and the legacy of unexploded ordnance offers a crucial perspective. Germany, for instance, still dedicates significant resources each year to clearing unexploded munitions from World War II. This suggests the long-term commitment required for effective mine clearance in Ukraine, a commitment that will span decades and require international collaboration and sustained funding. While innovative technologies, such as drone-operated tractors, could potentially mitigate some risks, these are still relatively nascent technologies and would not entirely eliminate the dangers.
To put the scale into perspective, a reported demining operation in specific regions cleared only 2.5 square kilometers of land. This figure, when compared to the estimated 100,000 square kilometers currently under Russian occupation, highlights the sheer magnitude of the challenge ahead. The work done is undeniably impressive, but the reality is that the path to fully clearing Ukraine of mines is long and fraught with difficulties.
In conclusion, while the reported progress in mine clearance in Ukraine is encouraging, we should temper our enthusiasm with a realistic understanding of the enormous task that lies ahead. The 70% figure, while positive, requires more detailed contextual information to fully comprehend its significance. It’s a long-term project requiring sustained international cooperation, advanced technological solutions, and a level of dedication that may span generations. The legacy of this war, manifested in the form of landmines and unexploded ordnance, is a grim reminder of the lasting impact of conflict, even after the fighting has ceased.