By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Trump’s rapid-fire attacks on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives are multifaceted, ranging from blaming DEI for the Washington D.C. plane crash to issuing an executive order barring transgender individuals from military service. This order labels transgender service members as inherently disloyal, highlighting a core principle of Trump’s renewed platform. His actions aim to shift public perception, attributing various failings to DEI programs, even those implemented during his own presidency. The transparent nature of these attacks allows for clear identification of the battle lines in the emerging political conflict.
Read the original article here
Donald Trump’s level of intelligence has consistently been a topic of discussion, and frankly, it’s become increasingly clear that he’s far less intelligent than many initially believed. The depth of his intellectual shortcomings is truly staggering.
It’s not simply a matter of political disagreements; his demonstrated lack of understanding of fundamental concepts is alarming. His economic policies, for instance, often reveal a profound misunderstanding of basic principles. His reliance on simplistic analogies, like comparing modern government to its far less complex 1800s counterpart, illustrates a failure to grasp the nuances of economic policy and its evolution. The sheer absurdity of his comparisons highlights a lack of critical thinking skills that should be expected of any leader, let alone a President of the United States.
Furthermore, his language is frequently imprecise and misleading. He often uses phrases like “we will take in” vast sums of money from tariffs, obscuring the fact that it’s the government, not the people, who will receive those funds. This deliberate obfuscation, coupled with his inability to articulate a coherent plan for utilizing this revenue, further underscores a concerning lack of competence. The suggestion that he desires a “sovereign wealth fund” feels more like an opportunity for personal enrichment and corruption than a sound fiscal strategy. His supposed reverence for the Gilded Age, with its inherent corruption and cronyism, speaks volumes about his priorities and understanding of governance.
His decision-making process also raises serious concerns. Evidence suggests that he relies heavily on the advice of his aides, often exhibiting a lack of comprehension or engagement with the complexities of the information presented to him. The suspicion that he may only retain a fraction of what he’s told further amplifies the gravity of this issue. His actions often appear arbitrary, driven by personal whims rather than well-reasoned strategic considerations, like using tariffs as a tool to control private businesses rather than as a legitimate economic policy.
The disturbing reality is that Trump’s intellectual limitations have not only been evident for years but have been consistently dismissed or downplayed by many. His business history, riddled with bankruptcies and shady dealings, should have served as a warning sign. His past behavior in various enterprises offered clear evidence of a lack of acumen and questionable ethics. Yet, despite this history, his charisma and ability to manipulate a specific segment of the population enabled him to attain the highest office in the land.
The question is not merely about Trump’s intelligence, but also about the discernment of the electorate. The fact that a significant portion of the population supported him despite overwhelming evidence of his incompetence is truly unsettling. It suggests a broader societal problem; a deficiency in critical thinking skills and a susceptibility to misinformation. The level of political engagement also varies significantly among citizens, causing a gap in understanding and creating further division.
The issue is not solely about the shocking revelation of his intellectual limitations, but also about the realization of how easily such inadequacies could be exploited and leveraged to ascend to the highest office in the land. The consequences of this situation are far-reaching, impacting domestic and foreign policies alike. It points to a deeper systemic failure, one that requires critical examination and proactive measures to ensure that similar scenarios are avoided in the future. The very notion that such blatant shortcomings could result in leadership at this level is nothing short of terrifying. This incident serves as a potent reminder that the need for informed and discerning citizens is paramount to the health and integrity of a democratic society.
The collective “we” in this discussion is not monolithic; many, perhaps even a majority, have been aware of Trump’s lack of intelligence for years. However, the sheer magnitude of the realization that he is far dumber than even the most pessimistic observers initially thought should be a cause for serious reflection on the political discourse, the vulnerabilities of the electoral process, and the critical need for enhanced civic education and media literacy. The implications are far-reaching and deeply unsettling.