By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump’s recent physical examination, conducted by White House physician Sean Barbabella, revealed ostensibly positive results, including strong cognitive and physical health assessments. However, the inclusion of Trump’s “frequent victories in golf events” in the report suggests an attempt to appease the president’s ego rather than provide an objective health assessment. This prioritization of placating Trump’s ego over honest evaluation raises significant concerns regarding his mental health. The physician’s actions highlight a broader pattern within the White House of prioritizing Trump’s emotional needs over delivering difficult truths.
Read the original article here
Trump’s annual physical, often presented as a routine health check, actually offers a compelling, albeit indirect, diagnosis of significant mental illness. The very act of framing the exam in terms of a “North Korea-style physical” speaks volumes. The emphasis isn’t on genuine medical assessment, but rather on a performance designed to maintain a carefully crafted public image, reinforcing the idea of a powerful, healthy figure. This reveals an underlying fragility, a need for constant reassurance and validation, indicative of profound psychological issues.
The reports often include oddly specific, positive mentions, such as “frequent victories in golf events.” These are not medically relevant details; they serve to bolster Trump’s ego, a key indicator of narcissistic personality disorder. The inclusion of such trivial, self-congratulatory remarks suggests a doctor overly concerned with placating the patient rather than providing a truly objective medical assessment. This isn’t accidental; it highlights the power dynamic at play and how deeply ingrained the need for ego-boosting has become.
It’s not necessary to read “between the lines” to identify the issue; the lines themselves scream it. Decades of public appearances, statements, and actions paint a consistent picture of a personality marred by malignant narcissism. This involves a potent cocktail of narcissistic traits combined with antisocial behaviors, paranoia, aggression, and a profound lack of empathy. Trump’s public persona consistently demonstrates these characteristics: an exaggerated sense of self-importance, manipulative behaviors, a tendency to blame others, and a persistent need for power and control.
The argument that Trump’s entourage acts out of subconscious awareness of his illness is simplistic. While subconscious influences exist, the reality is far more straightforward: fear. Trump’s team enables his behavior not out of unwitting complicity, but due to a well-founded fear of his wrath and retaliation. Their actions are consciously calculated to maintain their position and avoid conflict. The diagnosis of mental illness was obvious long before any formal assessment. Millions could have diagnosed the situation in a heartbeat.
The disturbing aspect is the election results. Two electoral victories for a person displaying such clear signs of mental instability highlight a broader societal issue: a profound lack of critical thinking, a widespread acceptance of misinformation, and a significant level of apathy among a substantial portion of the electorate. This lack of concern regarding a candidate’s mental health raises profound questions about the collective psyche of the nation.
The “physicals” become more about the physician’s well-being than the patient’s. Doctors, possibly fearing retribution, may underreport or downplay findings. This further highlights the toxic environment surrounding Trump and his interactions with his team, highlighting a pattern of enabling and appeasement that goes far beyond mere professionalism. A comprehensive psychological evaluation, like the MMPI, is far more appropriate than the cursory reports produced. Such an examination, if honestly conducted and reported, could offer a far more accurate assessment of Trump’s mental state.
The fact remains that Trump’s behavior constitutes substantial evidence of severe mental illness, and any cursory medical exam that fails to address this crucial aspect falls far short of its intended purpose. While some try to downplay the obvious by claiming we need more evidence or suggesting that other people have flaws, the evidence of Trump’s mental illness is overwhelming, readily available, and widely acknowledged, even by people who are not mental health professionals. The collective avoidance of confronting this reality, both within his circle and among the electorate, is arguably a far more significant issue than the diagnosis itself. The underlying question is not whether he is mentally ill, but rather, how did such a situation become politically acceptable, even electorally successful?