By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following the death of Manoj Kumar, actress Saira Banu shared unseen photos and anecdotes from their collaborations, highlighting their deep bond. Banu recalled Kumar’s considerate behavior on set, notably his willingness to leave during her solo shots to ease her shyness. She recounted instances of Kumar’s loyalty and respect, including his offer to shelve *Purab Aur Paschim* rather than replace her after her marriage. Kumar’s dedication and kindness, exemplified by these stories, are remembered fondly by Banu.
Read the original article here
Trump’s dismissal of China’s retaliatory tariffs as a panicked response is, frankly, baffling. He paints a picture of himself as a shrewd strategist, while characterizing China’s actions as a sign of weakness. This narrative, however, seems far removed from the reality of a trade war that’s causing significant economic ripples globally.
His assertion that China “played it wrong” ignores the fundamental principle of reciprocal action in trade disputes. China’s response was, in essence, a mirror image of Trump’s initial tariffs – a predictable and expected countermove. To label this as panic suggests a profound misunderstanding of international trade dynamics or, perhaps, a willful disregard for them.
The idea that China’s response was unexpected is simply untrue. Countries almost always retaliate against tariffs imposed upon them. It’s a standard practice, a fundamental aspect of trade negotiations, not a sign of panic. It’s as if Trump is surprised when someone pushes back after being punched. It’s a childish view of global politics.
The fact that Trump feels the need to mock China’s response is itself revealing. His comments seem less about economic strategy and more about ego preservation. It’s a reaction based on pride rather than rational assessment of the situation. He clearly expected a different response, one that would somehow validate his actions.
The implications of this trade war extend far beyond a simple tit-for-tat exchange. Trump’s actions have pushed many countries toward closer ties with China, potentially shifting global economic power dynamics in significant ways. While Trump might view this as China “panicking,” others might see it as a logical realignment in response to his disruptive policies.
Many question whether Trump even possesses a sophisticated understanding of international trade and global economics. His pronouncements on the subject often come across as simplistic and lacking in nuance, focusing on short-term gains while overlooking long-term consequences. It’s this lack of understanding that makes his mockery of China’s response all the more alarming.
The market reactions alone suggest that Trump’s strategy is failing. Global markets are in turmoil, and Trump’s attempts to portray this as some kind of victory only exacerbate the instability. His boasts about his economic prowess ring increasingly hollow in the face of this ongoing trade war and the negative global economic responses.
It appears he fundamentally misunderstands that in any trade war where both sides have significant leverage, neither side is likely to back down easily. His pronouncements sound like an attempt to bolster a narrative that is increasingly difficult to sustain. The claim of China “panicking” is not supported by evidence; instead, their measured responses suggest a calm and calculated approach.
It’s easy to see Trump’s pronouncements as a sign that the pressure is mounting. While he may portray strength, his reaction seems more indicative of a loss of control. The global community is seeing a more strategic and calculated China. This seems far from “panicking.”
The overall impression is one of disarray. The trade war is creating uncertainty, damaging relationships, and leaving the global economy vulnerable. Trump’s childish mockery only serves to amplify the perception of instability and unpredictability surrounding his administration’s policies. Perhaps his “genius” strategy only benefits those who are accustomed to navigating uncertainty.
In short, Trump’s mocking dismissal of China’s actions is nothing more than a desperate attempt to maintain a crumbling facade. The true panic, it seems, isn’t emanating from Beijing, but from Washington D.C. The world is watching, and the longer Trump continues down this path, the more apparent his lack of understanding of international relations will become. The consequences, it appears, are far-reaching and potentially devastating.