By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Trump administration, ordered by the Supreme Court to facilitate the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia from El Salvador’s CECOT prison, instead feigned compliance. The administration, along with Salvadoran President Bukele, engaged in a disingenuous exchange, shifting responsibility for Garcia’s repatriation. This action, stemming from the mass deportation of individuals with negligible evidence of criminal activity, demonstrates blatant disregard for the Supreme Court’s ruling. The administration’s assertion that this is a matter of foreign policy, not subject to judicial review, represents a dangerous expansion of executive power, potentially jeopardizing the rights of American citizens. This defiance of a Supreme Court order underscores a growing trend of presidential lawlessness, leaving the Court to determine whether to uphold the Constitution or condone such actions.
Read the original article here
The Constitutional Crisis Is Here
The erosion of due process, the blatant disregard for Supreme Court rulings; these aren’t isolated incidents, they’re symptoms of a deeper, more insidious illness. This isn’t a new crisis; it’s a culmination of years of escalating disregard for established norms and the rule of law. It’s been simmering, growing steadily worse, yet largely ignored or minimized until now.
The crisis wasn’t born on January 6th, 2021, though that event certainly served as a stark warning. Its roots stretch back further, possibly to 2019 or even earlier, a gradual chipping away at the foundations of American democracy. The constant undermining of democratic institutions, the normalization of authoritarian tendencies, and a pervasive enabling from segments of the media have all played a significant role. We’ve watched, seemingly passively, as checks and balances have failed to function effectively.
The current situation represents a profound threat. The extrajudicial imprisonment of an individual, coupled with the open defiance of a unanimous Supreme Court ruling, signals a catastrophic breakdown of the justice system. This is no longer merely a political disagreement; it is a direct assault on the very principles upon which the nation is founded. The red line has been crossed, and the consequences are potentially devastating.
The silence from the Supreme Court itself is deeply concerning. Their inaction amplifies the crisis, leaving many to wonder if any recourse remains within the existing legal framework. This lack of response only serves to embolden those who would subvert the Constitution and undermine its authority. The absence of a robust response from the Court or other branches of government raises alarming questions about the viability of constitutional checks and balances.
The current situation is unprecedented. No other president, regardless of party affiliation, would have faced such minimal backlash for actions as egregious as those witnessed. The lack of widespread outrage, of forceful corporate repercussions, and of consistent media coverage is astonishing. This complacent acceptance of what should be widely recognized as unacceptable behavior is deeply troubling and underscores the severity of the crisis.
The dismantling of the voting system is another alarming development. This systematic attack on the democratic process, aimed at ensuring continued power for a specific faction, leaves little room for hope. There is no longer a clear path to justice within the established legal system. The avenues for resolving the crisis through traditional political means appear to have been closed off.
The current state of affairs has created a stark choice: address the problem now, before the situation escalates further, or face even graver consequences later. The potential for violence and loss of life is very real, and inaction has dire implications. We can no longer afford to delay, to hope for a peaceful resolution to this very dangerous scenario.
The media’s role in shaping public perception cannot be overlooked. The reluctance to frame the current situation as a full-blown constitutional crisis is both perplexing and disturbing. The lack of attention and the minimization of the severity of the crisis creates a false sense of security and enables the further erosion of democratic norms. This silence, intentional or not, could have catastrophic ramifications.
Protests, strikes, and other forms of civil disobedience are being suggested, highlighting a growing sense of urgency and frustration. While such actions carry risks, the alternative – continued inaction – poses an even greater threat. The potential for the situation to deteriorate even further, possibly resulting in the suspension of elections or other unconstitutional actions, looms large.
The magnitude of the crisis is hard to overstate. We stand at a critical juncture, and the consequences of inaction will be far-reaching. The question is no longer whether a constitutional crisis exists; it’s whether we have the collective will to address it before it’s too late.