By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In Los Angeles, Senators Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez addressed an estimated 36,000 people at a “Fighting Oligarchy” rally, criticizing the Trump administration’s policies and advocating for the working class. The rally, part of a nationwide tour, aimed to energize voters concerned about budget cuts impacting social programs and the perceived enrichment of the wealthy at the expense of the public. Attendees expressed feelings of discouragement and hopelessness regarding the current political climate, finding solace and community at the event. The rally highlighted the progressive duo’s efforts to mobilize support ahead of the midterm elections and beyond.
Read the original article here
Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s recent rally in Los Angeles drew an impressive crowd of 36,000 attendees, making it their largest rally to date. This significant turnout underscores the continued enthusiasm for their progressive message, even outside of a traditional election cycle. The sheer scale of the event is noteworthy; it’s a testament to the power of grassroots mobilization and the continued resonance of their political platform.
The rally’s success is particularly striking given its timing, coinciding with Coachella, a major music festival that typically draws a considerable portion of Los Angeles’s population. The fact that so many still chose to attend this political gathering suggests a strong level of commitment and engagement among their supporters. This demonstrates a dedicated fanbase committed to their political ideals, even amidst competing events and attractions.
While some attendees expressed a desire for a more clearly defined call to action, the rally served a vital purpose in energizing the base and fostering a sense of community among progressive voters. In the current political climate, with Republicans controlling both the House and Senate and holding a majority on the Supreme Court, the primary strategy for the Democrats might be precisely what this rally represented: building enthusiasm and maintaining active engagement among supporters. By keeping the political conversation alive and reminding people of the importance of midterm elections, these kinds of events play a crucial role in the broader political landscape.
The event also highlighted the crucial role of local politicians in galvanizing support for broader political movements. One attendee specifically lauded a local councilmember’s impassioned speech, suggesting the potential for collaboration and synergy between national-level figures and local representatives. This underscores the importance of building support at all levels of government and leveraging local networks to broaden the impact of national movements.
However, the focus on Los Angeles, a reliably blue city, raised questions from some regarding the strategic allocation of resources. Some questioned why Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez didn’t prioritize rallies in states where the Democratic Party faces greater challenges, such as Oklahoma. A counterargument was made that prioritizing states with potential for growth in Democratic support, like Idaho or Utah, might be a more effective strategy in the long term. Further, the focus on energizing the base in a reliably Democratic state could also be seen as a necessary step towards building momentum for future campaigns and election cycles.
The skepticism wasn’t limited to the geographical focus. Some attendees expressed deep frustration with the Democratic Party’s perceived inaction and perceived lack of cohesive messaging. This sentiment highlights the existing tension between the progressive wing of the party, represented by Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez, and more centrist elements. The concern raised speaks to a broader issue within the Democratic Party, highlighting the internal struggle to balance the need for unity with the demands for more decisive action on key progressive issues.
Despite the criticism, the rally’s impressive turnout demonstrates a persistent demand for the kind of progressive politics championed by Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez. Their consistent focus on issues like the negative impact of money in politics, the need to protect social security, and concerns about market manipulation shows a continued effort to engage with the electorate’s key anxieties. The rally served as a platform to reiterate these core concerns and amplify a powerful message, echoing the kind of consistent, widespread campaigning done by the Republicans to rally their base.
The post-rally discussion also highlighted a contentious debate surrounding Los Angeles Councilmember Hernandez. While some praised her passionate speech, others criticized her as a NIMBY (Not In My Backyard) who opposes new development, particularly affordable housing. This disagreement exposed the complexities of urban politics and the challenges of balancing progressive ideals with practical considerations of urban planning and development. The controversy serves as a potent reminder of the inherent difficulties in navigating urban development policies and their impact on affordability and social justice. The debate around her underscores how even within progressive circles, there can be significant disagreements on matters of local governance and policy implementation.
Ultimately, the 36,000-person rally demonstrates the ongoing appeal of Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez’s progressive message. Whether this translates into broader political change remains to be seen; however, the rally’s success serves as a strong reminder of the enthusiasm and the widespread support for their political vision. The event’s success highlights a critical component of political mobilization: the power of large, enthusiastic rallies to energize the base and strengthen the message of progressive politicians. The massive turnout suggests a continued need for this style of political engagement, and a desire among voters to see these issues addressed through concerted political action.