By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A Palm Sunday Russian missile strike on Sumy, Ukraine, resulted in at least 34 deaths and over 117 injuries, including children. Reports confirm the use of cluster munitions, a weapon that scatters numerous smaller explosives over a wide area, causing widespread devastation and civilian casualties. This attack follows a similar incident in Kryvyi Rih, also employing cluster munitions. International condemnation, including from U.S. Ambassador Brink and other world leaders, has been swift and widespread. The use of cluster munitions in populated areas further underscores the brutality of the ongoing conflict.
Read the original article here
Russia’s use of cluster munitions in a deadly attack on Sumy, as reported by the outgoing US ambassador to Ukraine, is a deeply disturbing development. The sheer act of targeting a civilian population center with such a weapon speaks volumes about the disregard for human life. This isn’t simply a military engagement; it’s a blatant disregard for international norms and the principles of warfare.
The specific type of missile employed, a ballistic cluster munition, further underscores the severity of the situation. These missiles are not designed for precision strikes; their purpose is to inflict widespread damage over a large area. This makes the targeting of a populated city even more shocking and morally reprehensible.
The Russian claim that the strike targeted a building hosting a military gathering rings hollow. The weapon’s capabilities and cost simply don’t align with such a mission profile. Ballistic cluster munitions are expensive, high-precision weapons generally reserved for hard targets like warships or armored formations. Employing such a weapon against a civilian area suggests a deliberate intent to inflict maximum casualties.
There’s a stark contrast between the reactions to cluster munition use by Ukraine versus Russia. The outrage surrounding Russia’s actions stems from the deliberate targeting of civilians and their use within a populated area. Ukraine’s use of similar weapons, by contrast, is primarily directed at military targets as a matter of self-defense. This key distinction underscores the difference between a defensive action and an act of aggression against innocent people.
The issue of unexploded ordnance also adds another layer of concern. Cluster munitions often leave behind a lethal legacy of unexploded submunitions, posing a lasting threat to civilian populations. This long-term danger highlights the devastating and indiscriminate nature of these weapons.
The silence from the White House, as several sources have noted, is particularly concerning given the scale of this atrocity. The lack of immediate condemnation leaves a significant void in the international response. The world needs strong and unequivocal messaging against this violation of international law and humanitarian principles. This silence could be interpreted as an implicit acceptance of this kind of violence, emboldening further aggression.
The contrast between the reactions to cluster munition use by Ukraine and Russia underscores the crucial difference between self-defense and deliberate attacks on civilians. While the use of cluster munitions is inherently controversial and carries risks of civilian casualties, the context matters greatly.
Some have pointed to the fact that neither Ukraine nor the US are signatories to the treaty banning cluster munitions. While this is true, it doesn’t negate the moral and ethical implications of Russia’s actions. The deliberate targeting of civilians with weapons designed for widespread destruction stands in stark contrast to any justifiable use of these munitions. The absence of a legally binding treaty doesn’t make the act any less reprehensible.
The potential for depopulation of Sumy adds a further chilling dimension to Russia’s actions. The use of cluster munitions in a civilian area could be seen as an attempt to frighten residents into leaving their homes, creating an environment that is more conducive to potential occupation. This underscores a possible strategy of ethnic cleansing or population displacement. Regardless of the intent, the devastating consequences remain.
In conclusion, the use of cluster munitions in Sumy is not merely a military action; it’s a war crime. The deliberate targeting of civilians, the disregard for international law, and the long-term dangers posed by unexploded ordnance all point to the grave need for a strong and unified international response. The world should not stand idly by while such atrocities are committed. This act demands condemnation and an immediate halt to the use of these inhumane weapons.