By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Right-wing media outlets have expressed outrage over Democrats’ increased use of profanity in public, deeming it “undignified” and “embarrassing,” despite overlooking similar behavior from Donald Trump and his supporters. This hypocrisy is highlighted by the stark contrast between the right’s past acceptance of Trump’s frequent swearing and their current condemnation of Democrats employing similar language. Conservative pundits suggest the Democrats’ profanity is a strategic, calculated move, unlike what they characterize as Trump’s more spontaneous outbursts. This selective outrage underscores a double standard in the media’s coverage of political discourse.
Read the original article here
The sudden outrage from the “f*** your feelings” crowd over Democrats using profanity is, frankly, baffling. It’s the same group that, just a few years ago, seemed to revel in the use of vulgar language directed at political opponents. The hypocrisy is staggering.
This isn’t about a sudden elevation of profanity in political discourse; it’s about selective outrage. Suddenly, the casual deployment of swear words by Democrats is deemed “next level,” while the same language used by Republicans was apparently perfectly acceptable, even celebrated.
The cognitive dissonance is astounding. We’ve seen cars plastered with “F*** Joe Biden” slogans, teenagers sporting the same phrase on their clothing, and a seemingly endless stream of online content pushing the same message. Where was the pearl-clutching then?
This selective outrage reeks of a calculated strategy. It’s a distraction tactic, diverting attention from serious issues. The focus shifts from crucial topics – such as potential constitutional violations, economic damage, and human rights abuses – to a manufactured controversy over the use of curse words.
This isn’t about decorum; it’s about power. The “f*** your feelings” crowd is trying to regain control of the narrative by targeting an easily digestible talking point. The goal is to portray Democrats as uncouth and uncivil, thus undermining their credibility and deflecting criticism.
It’s also a blatant case of double standards. The same people who previously embraced profane attacks now feign shock and dismay. It’s as if the rules of acceptable language only apply when Democrats are involved.
The selective application of outrage is particularly glaring considering the context. We’re talking about a political climate where insults and personal attacks have become normalized, yet Democrats using profanity is suddenly presented as a grave transgression. The irony is palpable.
This manufactured outrage is effective because it plays on ingrained social norms. Certain levels of behavior are expected from those in power, especially when dealing with the public. But these are changing times, and people are looking for ways to break the mold.
The timing of this controversy is also suspect. It comes at a point where the political landscape is shifting. The outrage over Democratic profanity is a desperate attempt to regain momentum and deflect from growing criticisms.
The entire situation is absurd. It underscores the shallowness of political discourse and the lengths to which some will go to maintain power. The “f*** your feelings” crowd’s sudden sensitivity to profanity exposes their hypocrisy and the manipulative nature of their tactics.
In reality, this manufactured outrage is nothing more than a cheap tactic to distract from the real issues at hand. It’s an attempt to control the conversation and shift the focus away from more serious concerns. It is a sad commentary on the state of political discourse.
The bottom line is this: if the “f*** your feelings” crowd is suddenly so offended by profanity, maybe they should look in the mirror before pointing fingers. Their inconsistent application of standards reveals a level of hypocrisy that undermines their credibility and reveals the true motivation behind their outrage.
Ultimately, this manufactured outrage highlights the depth of the political divide and the willingness of some to resort to cheap tactics to win an argument, rather than engaging in genuine debate. The selective application of outrage highlights a double standard that should not be ignored. It’s a clear sign that some will do anything to avoid accountability.