By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Despite Russia’s announced Easter ceasefire, Ukrainian President Zelenskyy reported continued Russian attacks, including the detection of Shahed drones shortly after the declared commencement. This contradicts Russia’s claim of a unilateral ceasefire contingent upon reciprocal Ukrainian actions. Ukrainian forces, meanwhile, reported maintaining their positions in Kursk and advancing in Belgorod. Despite the ceasefire declaration, Ukrainian authorities maintained warnings to citizens regarding ongoing threats of Russian attacks.
Read the original article here
Zelenskyy’s assertion that the continued drone attacks over Ukraine during Easter, despite a purported ceasefire, starkly reveals Putin’s true disregard for both the holiday and human life. The supposed truce, announced by Russia, was clearly a cynical maneuver, a mere pause to allow for regrouping and resupply, rather than a genuine gesture of peace. Reports of shelling immediately following the ceasefire’s commencement, particularly the targeting of a residential building in Kherson, exemplify this blatant disregard for any commitment to de-escalation.
The hypocrisy is palpable. Putin’s history is rife with broken promises and disregard for internationally recognized holidays, including Christmas. There’s a pattern here, a predictable and disturbing pattern of exploiting periods intended for peace for strategic military advantage. The claim of a ceasefire only holding if Ukraine adheres to it is ludicrous, a blatant attempt to shift blame and justify further aggression. The reality is that Ukraine is defending its own territory and has every right to reposition its troops as the circumstances demand.
This alleged ceasefire is, therefore, not a ceasefire at all, but rather a cynical tactic to allow Russia to continue its attacks while accusing Ukraine of violating any perceived agreement. It’s a deliberate manipulation, a classic Soviet tactic of agreeing to terms, immediately breaking them, and then feigning innocence. This strategy relies on the hope that the international community will be hesitant to escalate, thus granting Russia a decisive tactical advantage. The relentless drone strikes, framed as “reconnaissance,” further underline this calculated approach; they are attacks in disguise, collecting intelligence while maintaining a veneer of plausible deniability.
The continued attacks also expose Putin’s callous indifference to the suffering of both Ukrainian and Russian civilians. The notion that a leader would bomb residential buildings mere moments after declaring a ceasefire underscores a profound absence of empathy and a contempt for human life. The fact that this occurs during a religious holiday further amplifies the cruelty and demonstrates an utter lack of respect for any form of shared humanity or common values. The focus shifts from any semblance of adherence to norms to a focus solely on military gain, regardless of the human cost.
The suggestion that Ukraine should respond by targeting Russian civilian infrastructure, while understandably born out of frustration and a desire for retribution, is problematic. While the devastation inflicted on Ukrainian civilians is abhorrent, mirroring that suffering risks descending to Putin’s level, potentially jeopardizing international support and widening the conflict. Ukraine’s limited resources should be prioritized for eliminating strategically crucial military targets—targets that can directly impede Russia’s war effort and bring about a quicker end to the conflict. Furthermore, the historical ineffectiveness of targeting civilians to achieve military objectives is undeniable. Bombing civilian areas is a morally reprehensible tactic, and historically has proved largely ineffective in achieving long-term military goals.
The calls for Putin’s removal from power are understandable, given the sheer scale of atrocities committed under his regime. The war in Ukraine is not merely a territorial dispute but a demonstration of a complete disregard for international law and basic human decency. A lasting solution requires not only military action, but also a fundamental shift in Russia’s political landscape. This will likely necessitate a dramatic change within Russia itself, pushing the Russian people to confront the consequences of their government’s actions and demand accountability.
The situation underlines the urgent need for a concerted international effort to hold Putin accountable for his actions. The persistent targeting of civilians, the callous disregard for holidays, and the blatant disregard for any form of peaceful negotiation collectively paint a picture of a leader driven by unfettered aggression and a profound detachment from humanity. The events of Easter Sunday serve as a stark reminder of the brutality of the conflict and the immense task ahead in achieving a lasting peace.