JPMorgan Chase has raised its global recession probability to 60%, citing the Trump administration’s new tariffs as a major contributing factor. This significant increase stems from a reassessment of U.S. trade policy, now deemed considerably less business-friendly than previously anticipated. The bank highlights the tariffs’ substantial impact, equating to the largest tax increase since 1968 and potentially exacerbating economic hardship through retaliatory measures and decreased business confidence. JPMorgan projects that the full implementation of these policies could trigger a U.S., and potentially global, recession in 2019.

Read the original article here

JPMorgan’s assessment of a 60% chance of a U.S. and global recession is understandably causing widespread concern, and many feel this figure is far too conservative. The sheer scale of the potential economic downturn is alarming, given the interconnectedness of the global economy. The implications for individuals, businesses, and nations are vast and potentially devastating.

The rapid escalation in the perceived risk, from a previously lower percentage, further fuels anxieties. Many observers believe that the actual probability is far higher, with some suggesting percentages well above 60%, even reaching 100%. The sentiment reflects a sense of impending doom, with fears about the future being openly expressed.

This heightened sense of unease stems from a multitude of contributing factors. The impact of specific economic policies, including tariffs and taxes, are cited as significant drivers, with concerns that these measures are unnecessarily reducing discretionary income and creating significant economic hardship for many. The projected decrease in purchasing power, leading to reduced consumption and potential job losses, is a significant source of worry.

The political climate is also a major concern. The persistent debate over the responsibility for past recessions and the current economic situation is exacerbating tensions and fueling uncertainty. Accusations that specific political parties are to blame are prevalent and highlight the deeply partisan nature of the discussion. This political backdrop creates further uncertainty and hampers efforts to find a cohesive and effective response to the potential crisis.

Furthermore, the geopolitical implications are equally worrying. The risk of a global recession casts a long shadow over international relations, potentially leading to instability and increased tensions worldwide. The possibility of a global economic reorganization, with nations reducing their dependence on the U.S. economy, further underscores the seriousness of the situation.

The uncertainty is amplified by the lack of clarity on who benefits from the policies contributing to this increased risk. The fact that major businesses and billionaires are expressing significant alarm indicates the depth of the potential economic fallout. Questions about the rationale behind these policies, especially given the warnings from business leaders and the potential for widespread economic devastation, remain unanswered and are a major source of frustration.

The general sentiment is one of disbelief and anger. Many express frustration with the lack of accountability for the decisions driving the economy towards recession. The perception that powerful individuals are making decisions with potentially catastrophic consequences, without facing repercussions, adds to the sense of helplessness and cynicism.

The reactions on social media and in online forums mirror this sentiment. The overall tone is overwhelmingly pessimistic, with many feeling the stated 60% probability is far too optimistic, reflecting a prevalent feeling that the reality is far grimmer. The discussions highlight the deep anxieties about personal finances, job security, and the overall future.

Ultimately, the JPMorgan estimate of a 60% chance of a U.S. and global recession serves as a stark warning, even if many believe the actual likelihood is considerably higher. The underlying issues – economic policies, political gridlock, and the potential for geopolitical instability – are complex and interwoven, contributing to a highly volatile and uncertain economic outlook. The lack of clear solutions and the prevailing sense of impending doom are shaping the narrative and driving the widespread concern.