By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following India’s punitive actions against Pakistan, the Pakistani National Security Committee (NSC) convened and responded with a series of retaliatory measures. These included suspending the Simla Agreement and all bilateral agreements with India, closing the Wagah border, and revoking SAARC visas for Indian nationals (excluding Sikh pilgrims). Furthermore, Pakistan declared Indian defense advisors persona non grata, reduced Indian High Commission staff, closed its airspace to Indian aircraft, and suspended all trade with India. Pakistan also vowed a comprehensive response to any further threats to its sovereignty.
Read the original article here
Pakistan’s recent actions represent a significant escalation in tensions with India. The closure of Pakistani airspace to all Indian-owned or operated aircraft is a dramatic move, severely impacting air travel between the two nations and forcing Indian airlines to reroute flights, adding significant time and cost. This disruption affects not only passengers but also trade and commerce, highlighting the far-reaching consequences of this decision.
The suspension of the Simla Agreement, a cornerstone of India-Pakistan relations, is even more alarming. This agreement, signed in 1972, aimed to normalize relations following the 1971 war. Its suspension signifies a deep breakdown in trust and a willingness to abandon established diplomatic frameworks. The broader implications of this suspension are unclear, but it certainly signals a serious deterioration in the bilateral relationship.
Adding to the escalating tension, Pakistan has also suspended all bilateral agreements with India. This sweeping action encompasses various areas of cooperation, including trade, visas, and diplomatic exchanges. The decision to revoke visas for Indian nationals, with the exception of Sikh pilgrims, mirrors a similar Indian action and further demonstrates the tit-for-tat nature of the current crisis.
Pakistan’s actions extend beyond the symbolic realm. The expulsion of Indian defense, naval, and air advisors underscores the gravity of the situation, and the reduction of Indian High Commission staff to 30 personnel reflects a substantial curtailment of diplomatic presence. These decisions, mirroring those taken previously by India, escalate the atmosphere of distrust and hostility.
The closure of the Wagah Border Post, a historically significant crossing point, adds another layer to the escalating crisis. This symbolic closure, mirroring India’s prior decision, further reinforces the severed nature of the relationship, and highlights the breakdown in even the most basic channels of communication and interaction.
Pakistan’s decision to halt all trade with India, including trade routed through third countries, will have significant economic repercussions for both nations. This complete severance of trade ties demonstrates a willingness to inflict substantial economic pain in pursuit of their objectives, underlining the severity of the current situation.
Furthermore, Pakistan’s pledge of a “full-spectrum national power response” to any threat against its sovereignty is a serious statement, suggesting a preparedness to utilize all available means to defend its interests. This declaration leaves open the possibility of various responses, ranging from further diplomatic actions to military escalation, making the situation exceedingly unpredictable.
The closure of Pakistani airspace, coupled with other retaliatory measures, leaves little room for optimism in the immediate future. While the possibility of full-scale war is often discussed, the more likely scenario appears to involve continued diplomatic sparring and perhaps limited, localized military actions. The potential for proxy conflicts remains a real concern, given the history of tensions between the two nations.
Concerns regarding the impact of this conflict extend far beyond the immediate actors. The potential disruption to global trade, specifically air travel routes, is substantial. The ripple effects are significant, impacting not only airlines but also international commerce and passenger travel. Furthermore, the possibility of regional instability, with potential involvement of other regional powers, cannot be discounted.
The underlying causes of the conflict, though not fully articulated in the provided information, clearly indicate deep-seated issues that have a long history. The mention of the Indus Waters Treaty and historical grievances suggest that this escalation is not an isolated incident, but rather the culmination of long-standing disagreements and mutual distrust.
The humanitarian consequences of the escalating tension are also of serious concern. The disruption to trade and travel will disproportionately impact ordinary citizens on both sides, exacerbating existing economic hardships. The potential for unintended escalation, leading to wider conflict, raises the specter of a far greater humanitarian catastrophe.
In conclusion, the situation between India and Pakistan is exceptionally volatile. The actions taken by Pakistan, particularly the closure of airspace and suspension of the Simla Agreement, represent a sharp escalation in tensions, highlighting the fragility of peace in the region and the urgent need for diplomatic intervention to de-escalate the situation and prevent further escalation. The coming days and weeks will be crucial in determining the trajectory of this conflict and its implications for regional stability.