By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Hungary’s parliament is poised to vote on a constitutional amendment that severely restricts LGBTQ+ rights and expands government power. The amendment codifies a ban on Pride events, enabling the use of facial recognition technology against attendees, and constitutionally recognizes only two sexes. Furthermore, it allows the government to suspend the citizenship of dual nationals deemed a threat to national security, a move criticized as suppressing dissent. Opposition groups have decried the amendment as a significant escalation of Orbán’s authoritarian tendencies, drawing parallels to Russia and prompting calls for protests. International condemnation from the EU and numerous embassies highlights the international concern over these actions.
Read the original article here
Hungary is reportedly on the verge of adopting a constitutional amendment that would effectively ban LGBTQ+ gatherings. This move has sparked widespread outrage and concern, raising questions about Hungary’s commitment to fundamental human rights and its place within the European Union.
The proposed amendment seemingly contradicts the principles enshrined in the EU charter, which champions equality and non-discrimination. This raises significant questions about the EU’s ability to enforce its own principles against member states that actively flout them. Many are questioning the EU’s response to Hungary’s actions, feeling that a stronger stance is necessary to prevent further erosion of fundamental rights.
The timing of this amendment is particularly troubling, given the ongoing concerns about the Hungarian government’s broader assault on democratic norms and institutions. Many believe that the ban on LGBTQ+ gatherings is merely a smokescreen, a tactic to suppress dissent and stifle any potential opposition mobilization. The fear is that this is a much wider attack on the right to assemble and protest, a cornerstone of any functioning democracy. The government’s fear of its own people taking to the streets to challenge its policies is arguably the root of this action. Creative workarounds, like renaming Pride celebrations as “tea gatherings”, are being suggested but underscore the absurdity of the situation.
The international outcry and condemnation of this proposed amendment have been swift and intense. Many view it as a stark example of far-right populism and a regressive step for human rights. However, the actual implementation of EU sanctions and other punitive measures remains uncertain, highlighting the limitations of the EU’s current mechanisms to address such blatant violations of its core values.
There’s a palpable sense of frustration among critics of the Hungarian government, who feel their concerns are being ignored. The argument that the Hungarian government’s actions are a threat not only to the LGBTQ+ community but also to the foundations of democratic governance in Europe is gaining traction. This frustration is magnified by the perceived inaction or limited response from the EU. The situation fuels calls for more robust action from the European Union to prevent Hungary from further backsliding into authoritarianism.
The comparison with other countries, particularly those in the United States that share similar conservative viewpoints, has also been made. The similarities in political rhetoric and policies are seen as concerning, fueling anxieties about the global trend of conservative movements adopting increasingly repressive measures. The fear is that if Hungary successfully circumvents EU regulations, it will embolden other countries with similar intentions.
Concerns about the EU’s ability to effectively address Hungary’s actions are further amplified by the complicated internal dynamics within the EU itself. The process of expelling a member state is extremely difficult, requiring unanimous agreement, which has proven to be extremely challenging. It is easier to sanction than expel, but even this approach faces its challenges.
The lack of a clear and effective mechanism to hold member states accountable for violations of fundamental human rights weakens the EU’s credibility and raises important questions about the union’s overall effectiveness in upholding its own stated values. The situation in Hungary underscores the ongoing tension between national sovereignty and supranational authority within the EU framework.
Ultimately, the proposed constitutional amendment in Hungary represents more than just a ban on LGBTQ+ gatherings; it embodies a wider erosion of democratic values and human rights. The international community’s response will be crucial in determining whether such actions remain unchecked or whether a firm stance can be taken to protect fundamental rights and the rule of law within the European Union. The long-term consequences of this action extend far beyond the borders of Hungary.