By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Sigmar Gabriel, former German foreign minister, suggests a partial EU membership for Canada to counter US President Trump’s attempts to integrate Canada into the United States. Gabriel argues that Canada’s values align more closely with Europe than some current EU members. This proposal comes in response to Trump’s repeated attempts to diminish Canada’s sovereignty and impose economic pressure. The proposed partial membership would offer Canada closer ties with the EU without requiring full integration.
Read the original article here
The idea of Canada joining the European Union is certainly a thought-provoking one. It’s easy to see why a former German foreign minister might suggest such a thing, considering the shared values and potential economic benefits. The sheer geographical distance, however, presents a significant hurdle. Convincing all EU member states to accept full Canadian membership would undoubtedly be a monumental task. Yet, perhaps a more nuanced approach focusing on economic integration rather than full membership could be more realistic and less contentious.
Many have pointed out the inherent difficulties of full EU membership for a country geographically distant from Europe. The practical implications of such a move would be substantial, touching upon everything from legal frameworks to the very definition of what constitutes “Europe.” Perhaps, focusing on strengthening economic ties through agreements similar to those Norway or Iceland have with the EU would be a more achievable and beneficial starting point. This would allow for closer economic cooperation without the complexities and potential political disagreements inherent in full membership.
While some might see geographical location as a decisive factor, others argue that shared values are paramount. Canada and the EU share a commitment to democratic principles, the rule of law, and a robust social safety net. These shared values could form a powerful foundation for a closer partnership, regardless of geographical proximity.
This perspective highlights the possibility of building stronger ties through various initiatives, such as increased joint military exercises. Hosting regular exercises involving EU, UK, Australian, Japanese, and New Zealand forces at a Canadian military base could foster deeper collaboration and understanding, laying the groundwork for a stronger defense partnership, and strengthening transatlantic ties more broadly.
The potential economic advantages are substantial as well. Canada possesses vast natural resources crucial for the EU’s economic growth, and closer cooperation could create significant mutual benefits. The synergy created through enhanced trade and resource sharing could lead to a more robust and resilient economic bloc for both parties.
However, some concerns have been raised about the potential impact on immigration. Joining the EU might lead to an increase in the flow of economic migrants to Canada. This raises the question of how Canada would manage its immigration policies to balance the benefits of closer integration with the need for controlled and sustainable immigration practices. A more targeted, merit-based approach might be necessary to mitigate potential challenges.
The discussion also touches upon the broader geopolitical landscape. With America’s reliability as a trading partner and ally being called into question, Canada strengthening its ties to Europe appears increasingly strategic. This move would diversify Canada’s economic and political partnerships, reducing its reliance on a single superpower.
The issue of Canadian inclusion in the EU is a complex and multifaceted one. While full membership faces considerable obstacles, the potential benefits of closer cooperation are undeniable. Perhaps, a pragmatic approach, focusing on strengthening economic ties and shared values, would pave the way for a mutually advantageous partnership, without the immediate need for full integration into the existing EU structure. The possibility of a broader, values-based alliance, expanding beyond the current geographical limits of the EU, is an exciting prospect that deserves further consideration. Ultimately, the decision rests with Canada, but the potential gains for both sides make the conversation well worth having.