By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Former Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard defended the Trump administration’s use of Signal, highlighting its secure communication capabilities while emphasizing the app’s prior use by Biden administration officials, including Jake Sullivan and Antony Blinken. Gabbard attributed the continued use to the app’s practicality for secure communication, stressing the need for secure options, despite recent “Signalgate” leaks revealing sensitive information shared within a Trump administration group chat. She criticized Democrats for overlooking this prior usage under the Biden administration.
Read the original article here
Tulsi Gabbard’s attempt to pin the blame for “Signalgate” on Joe Biden is, frankly, baffling. The sheer audacity of trying to shift responsibility for a classified information leak onto a former president, months after leaving office, is astounding. It suggests a fundamental misunderstanding of how government operates, or perhaps a deliberate attempt to deflect attention away from her own alleged role in the scandal.
The timing of this blame-shifting is also suspect. It’s almost May, and the incident occurred significantly earlier. Accusing someone who hasn’t held office for months makes the accusation itself look increasingly ridiculous. It’s a desperate attempt to distract from her own possible culpability in a matter that involves classified information.
The claim itself is incredibly weak. Even if we assume Biden possesses some level of technological understanding, it’s highly improbable he was directly involved in the alleged leak. The assertion that he bears responsibility, given the complexities of national security protocols and the hierarchical nature of intelligence sharing, strains credulity. It’s difficult to fathom how a former president, removed from daily governance, could be held responsible for the actions of those who remain in office.
The gravity of the situation demands attention. We’re not dealing with simple emails here; these were classified conversations containing sensitive, potentially top-secret information. The fact that these exchanges happened outside secure channels is a critical breach of protocol. The implication is that individuals responsible for safeguarding national security failed, jeopardizing the country’s interests.
The narrative that the current administration is solely responsible for such security lapses doesn’t hold water. The issues surrounding Signalgate likely involve a systemic problem within the intelligence community. The fact that alleged leaks involved high-ranking officials makes the situation even more concerning. Trying to shift blame to a single individual, especially one no longer in power, minimizes the magnitude of the problem.
The suggestion that the use of a third-party encrypted app, such as Signal, is acceptable for handling classified information is ludicrous. This is about far more than convenience; established security protocols exist for a reason. While Signal offers encryption, it bypasses official secure channels designed for precisely this type of sensitive communication. Ignoring these official procedures is a grave mistake, suggesting a serious lack of judgment and understanding of national security protocols.
The sheer incompetence, or more accurately, the reckless disregard for protocol, displayed by those involved is deeply alarming. The idea that those responsible are trying to use the “but they did it first” defense is not only childish, but shocking for individuals supposedly committed to national security. The argument falls apart immediately, revealing a flawed understanding of accountability. The focus should be on resolving the immediate security concerns, not finding scapegoats.
What makes this entire situation even more frustrating is the complete absence of accountability. The fact that individuals involved, especially those implicated in gross negligence, remain in their positions speaks volumes. This failure to take swift and decisive action only exacerbates the situation, raising serious questions about competence and integrity at the highest levels of government.
The constant attempts to deflect blame and engage in political point-scoring are incredibly frustrating. This should not be a political football; it’s a matter of national security. The focus should be on investigating the leak thoroughly, holding those responsible accountable, and implementing corrective measures to prevent future breaches. Instead, what we have is a chaotic mess of finger-pointing and misinformation, revealing a deep dysfunction within the system. The real victims are the American people whose national security is compromised by these actions. It’s clear that a reckoning is needed, but unfortunately, political maneuvering seems to be prioritized over actual solutions.