By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following a 2021 federal judge’s dismissal of his case due to unreliable evidence, Ameen was immediately rearrested by ICE and subsequently deported to Rwanda under the Biden administration. This deportation, based on weak evidence, marks Ameen as the first Trump-era deportation to Rwanda. His previous statement expressing gratitude for the justice system and his love for America stands in stark contrast to his current situation. The question of restitution and potential long-term displacement remains unanswered.
Read the original article here
Fox News, a network long associated with unwavering support for Donald Trump, recently published a poll revealing his approval rating at a mere 44%. This, in itself, represents a significant drop from previous polls and positions him below the approval ratings of previous presidents like Biden, Obama, and Bush at similar points in their presidencies. This seemingly minor detail—a five-point decrease from the previous month—is arguably a monumental shift, considering the network’s historical alignment with the former president. The fact that Fox News, a significant amplifier of Trump’s message and a key element in his political success, is now reporting such a low number speaks volumes.
This 44% figure, while still substantial, signifies a widespread dissatisfaction with Trump’s performance. The implication is clear: even within the traditionally conservative and pro-Trump audience Fox News serves, there’s a notable lack of support for the former president. The network’s acknowledgement of this lowered approval, therefore, amounts to an implicit admission that significant segments of the population—even those who might be considered likely supporters—are actively rejecting him. The fact that this was even reported, let alone framed as a significant and newsworthy event, rather than buried deep within the network, is truly remarkable.
The hesitancy to heavily publicize this poll result within Fox News itself is telling. The subdued reaction suggests an internal struggle within the network to reconcile its long-standing allegiance to Trump with the reality of his declining popularity. The lack of headline treatment speaks of an attempt to downplay a significant drop in favorability, possibly to avoid alienating their loyal, albeit shrinking, base of Trump supporters. This strategic silence arguably amplifies the significance of the poll itself, painting a picture of a network cautiously navigating shifting political tides.
There’s a palpable sense of disbelief surrounding the 44% figure itself. Many commenters express skepticism, suggesting that the actual number is significantly lower, possibly due to potential biases within the polling methodology. Some even claim that this represents a significant victory for the opposition, hinting at a widespread anti-Trump sentiment that transcends political affiliations. The idea that even a conservative media outlet like Fox News is reporting a figure as high as 44% highlights the deep divisions within the country and the strength of the pro-Trump faction, regardless of the apparent decline.
The underlying frustration is evident in many comments. People are tired of the political situation, weary of Trump’s leadership, and increasingly vocal about their dissatisfaction. The hope is for a shift toward more unified, less divisive leadership, but this sentiment is complicated by the enduring strength of Trump’s support base, despite its seemingly diminished numbers. This points to a complex and divided electorate, where deep-seated loyalties and ideologies complicate any simple narrative of universal rejection.
The continued presence of a relatively high, though declining, approval rating also underscores the enduring power of the “Trump cult,” as many have termed it. Even with undeniable negative press coverage and consistently unpopular policy decisions, a sizeable portion of the population maintains unwavering support for the former president. This loyalty, some suggest, is rooted in more than just policy preferences but transcends into something akin to a devoted following, immune to facts or negative polling data. This tenacious loyalty raises questions about the nature of political identity and its resistance to changing realities.
The discussion also brings up the inherent unreliability of polling data. The very nature of polling, its sampling methodologies, and potential biases frequently get discussed, often leading to skepticism about the accuracy of any poll. Furthermore, polls only represent a snapshot in time. Public opinion is fluid and often influenced by myriad factors, making it challenging to definitively capture the sentiment of an entire nation with a single poll. That being said, the fact that a traditionally pro-Trump source is reporting a relatively low approval rating is still noteworthy.
In conclusion, the Fox News poll, despite its potential limitations, represents a significant shift in the narrative surrounding Donald Trump’s popularity. While his base of support remains undeniably strong, its diminishing size and the reticence of Fox News to prominently advertise this poll result arguably signal a turning point. The lingering questions about the reliability of polling notwithstanding, the fact that even a generally pro-Trump network acknowledges the decline is a significant indicator that the former president’s grip on the American electorate is weakening. The future will reveal just how much and how quickly this trend will continue.