By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following Donald Trump’s reelection, reports of increased detentions and interrogations of tourists at US borders caused a decline in overseas visits. This prompted some, like Jenny, a British citizen, to cancel their US trip due to concerns about these practices and a perceived shift in the country’s atmosphere. While others, such as Sarah, reported no issues entering the US, anxiety surrounding border interactions remains, particularly for those with less privileged backgrounds or those in binational relationships, highlighting concerns about discriminatory practices. The increased scrutiny of US border procedures has, however, brought longstanding issues to light, prompting reflection on the treatment of various groups by authorities.
Read the original article here
The sentiment, “I don’t want to give money to this America,” resonates deeply with many, reflecting a palpable fear among international tourists regarding travel to the United States under a specific political climate. This isn’t simply a matter of economic boycott; it’s a complex fear rooted in concerns far exceeding mere financial considerations.
The fear isn’t solely about supporting a disliked administration through tourism revenue. Many express apprehension about potential encounters with law enforcement. The perception of arbitrary detention, particularly for those who don’t hold US citizenship, looms large. Stories of prolonged detentions without due process, even for legal visitors, fuel this anxiety. Concerns extend beyond simple inconvenience; the possibility of unjust imprisonment or deportation casts a long shadow over any potential travel plans.
The feeling of insecurity isn’t limited to the possibility of legal trouble. There are serious anxieties surrounding personal safety. The perception of increased violence and social unrest contributes to a sense of vulnerability for foreign visitors. The idea that basic rights might not be protected, that seeking justice for crimes committed against them could prove fruitless, creates a climate of fear and distrust.
This apprehension goes beyond individual incidents; it’s fueled by a broader perception of the country’s social and political climate. Many believe the country’s international reputation has suffered significantly, and the potential for long-term damage to trust and goodwill is a major concern. The idea that rebuilding this trust could take generations is alarming, signifying a deep-seated unease.
The concerns are not merely theoretical for many. Real-life anecdotes and conversations highlight the tangible impact of this apprehension. People are actively reconsidering or canceling travel plans, opting to spend their tourism dollars elsewhere. Families are re-evaluating vacations; individuals who once eagerly anticipated visiting the US now express hesitation or outright refusal. This isn’t just a matter of personal preference; it reflects a widespread shift in perception.
It’s not simply a case of “I don’t want to give money to this America,” but also “I don’t want to risk my safety and well-being in this America.” The very act of visiting is perceived as a gamble, with the potential for negative consequences outweighing the attractions of travel. This perception affects a broad range of potential travelers, impacting not only individual trips but also larger economic sectors that rely on tourism. The potential economic downturn resulting from this shift in tourism patterns is a significant factor.
The anxiety isn’t confined to international travelers. Many US citizens share the same sentiment, unwilling to contribute economically to what they perceive as a damaging political climate. This internal dissent further underscores the widespread unease, highlighting the depth of the issue and its impact across various segments of the population. They too are reconsidering their spending habits, actively seeking alternatives to US-based products and services.
The potential consequences extend beyond economics. The decreased tourism, coupled with a deteriorating international reputation, could have lasting repercussions on the country’s soft power and global standing. The anxiety isn’t merely a passing phase; it represents a profound shift in the way many perceive the US and their willingness to engage with it, both economically and socially.
Ultimately, the phrase “I don’t want to give money to this America” encapsulates a complex interplay of political anxieties, concerns about personal safety, and a perception of the country’s declining international reputation. It’s a sentiment that carries significant weight, representing not just an economic boycott but a broader expression of distrust and apprehension regarding the current political and social climate. The long-term consequences of this shift in perception are far-reaching and demand careful consideration.