By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Finland’s eastern border with Russia remains closed following a phased closure in late 2023 due to concerns over Russia using migrant flows to exert pressure. Parliament is currently reviewing an extension of the border security act, including a “pushback” law allowing the Border Guard to refuse entry to asylum seekers deemed part of Russia’s hybrid warfare tactics. This action is justified by the persistent risk of instrumentalised migration posing a significant threat to Finland’s national security and public order. The ongoing situation underscores the precarious geopolitical landscape in the region.
Read the original article here
Finland keeps its border with Russia closed “until further notice,” a decision that feels both stark and, in a way, unsurprising given the current geopolitical climate. It’s a move born from a deep understanding of Russia’s aggressive actions and a cautious recognition of the very real threat posed by its neighbor.
The closure isn’t simply a knee-jerk reaction; it’s a calculated measure informed by history. Finland, after all, has a painful past involving a direct confrontation with Russia during the Winter War. The echoes of that conflict, the memory of aggression and invasion, resonate deeply within the Finnish psyche, providing a powerful context for this latest decision. The current situation in Ukraine, with Russia’s ongoing and unprovoked invasion, only serves to amplify those historical anxieties.
Thinking about Putin’s ambitions and his blatant disregard for international norms, this border closure makes perfect sense as a preventative measure. It’s a clear statement that Finland intends to safeguard its sovereignty and national security, prioritizing the well-being of its citizens above any potential risk associated with an open border. It’s a demonstration of common sense in the face of a demonstrably unpredictable and volatile situation.
The “until further notice” aspect of the announcement is particularly telling. It indicates a lack of confidence in any short-term resolution to the tensions between Russia and the West. This isn’t a temporary closure for a specific event; it reflects a long-term assessment of risk, a recognition that the threat posed by Russia remains significant and potentially evolving. The decision underscores the deep uncertainty surrounding the future trajectory of Russo-Finnish relations, and indeed, the wider geopolitical landscape.
One can almost imagine the discussions within the Finnish government that led to this decision. The weighing of various factors, the considerations of economic implications versus the paramount need for security, the careful assessment of potential risks and the preparedness for unforeseen circumstances must have been immense. It speaks volumes about the Finnish government’s commitment to protecting its people and its unwavering resolve to maintain its independence.
The possibility of NATO using Finnish territory for military exercises is certainly a plausible scenario given the ongoing tensions. Finland’s strategic location, bordering both Russia and the Baltic Sea, makes it a crucial potential staging ground. Such exercises would, of course, be a significant demonstration of the West’s commitment to supporting Finland’s security and deterring further Russian aggression. It would also serve as a powerful signal to Moscow, reinforcing the message that any attempt to destabilize the region would be met with a strong, coordinated response. This adds yet another layer of complexity and strategic importance to the border closure.
Ultimately, the closure signifies a fundamental shift in the relationship between Finland and Russia. While past periods saw a degree of cooperation and interconnectedness, the current climate dictates a much more cautious and defensive posture. The border closure is a physical manifestation of this altered relationship, a visual representation of the deep mistrust and concern that currently define the dynamics between the two nations.
This move isn’t merely about physical security; it’s also about maintaining national integrity and identity. It’s about safeguarding Finland’s right to self-determination, its freedom to choose its own alliances and its path forward, unhindered by the coercive pressures emanating from its powerful neighbor. The closure represents a decisive commitment to these fundamental values.
Looking ahead, the duration of this closure remains uncertain. The situation in Ukraine, the overall geopolitical climate, and Russia’s actions will all continue to play a significant role in determining when, or even if, the border reopens. For now, the closed border serves as a potent symbol of Finland’s resolve, its unwavering commitment to its security, and its determination to chart its own course, free from undue influence. The long-term implications of this decision will undoubtedly shape the future of Russo-Finnish relations, and indeed, the broader security architecture of Northern Europe.