By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Due to reduced capacity within the FDA’s food safety and nutrition division, a quality control program for dairy product testing has been suspended. This suspension follows the termination of 20,000 Department of Health and Human Services employees and impacts multiple food safety programs, including bird flu and pathogen testing. The suspension affects the proficiency testing program for Grade “A” milk and related products, highlighting a significant setback for food safety oversight. This reduction in capacity comes despite a long history of FDA efforts to ensure the safety of the nation’s milk supply.
Read the original article here
I Know It Seems Impossible to Remember, but There Is Actually a Reason We Had an FDA
I know it seems impossible to remember why we need a Food and Drug Administration (FDA), especially in today’s climate. It’s easy to forget the horrors that prompted its creation, when the sheer scale of modern food production makes it seem like a distant, bureaucratic entity. But the need for the FDA stems from a deeply human desire—to avoid dying from contaminated food. This isn’t some abstract concept; it’s a fundamental instinct, a primal fear that runs as deep as our species’ history.
The sheer size and complexity of modern food supply chains necessitate expert oversight. Without it, we’re exposed to a terrifyingly wide range of potential hazards. Think beyond the obvious risks of bacterial contamination and spoiled produce. Before regulations, unscrupulous businesses engaged in practices that are hard to fathom today. Gypsum, that’s plaster, was sold as milk. To children. Because it was cheaper. The profit motive, unchecked, led to deliberate poisoning. This wasn’t an isolated incident; this was a common practice.
This isn’t some distant historical footnote either. The ease with which decades of established safeguards can be abandoned is shocking, especially when considering the devastating impact on families and children. Cutting corners to maximize profits jeopardizes the very foundation of our health and well-being, creating a ripple effect of harm that extends far beyond individual incidents of food poisoning. And it raises serious questions about what other critical safety measures might be undermined.
It’s naïve to believe that corporations, left to their own devices, wouldn’t prioritize profit above public safety. The inherent nature of unchecked capitalism is to push those boundaries; the only thing preventing widespread poisoning is the threat of legal consequences, fines, and shutdowns. The FDA, along with agencies like the EPA and OSHA, provides the crucial framework of regulation that safeguards our collective health and security. These agencies, though imperfect, are essential.
The FDA’s work is often invisible, precisely because it’s effective. We forget about it because it does its job well. We don’t see widespread outbreaks of preventable illnesses, not because they aren’t a threat, but because proactive regulation and enforcement minimize the risk. One chilling example is the near-constant stream of enforcement letters released by the FDA, detailing violations that would result in sickness and death without intervention. These letters show the scale of the problems the FDA successfully prevents from affecting the wider population.
And the consequences of understaffed and underfunded agencies are very real. There are numerous documented cases of companies knowingly producing unsafe products and facing minimal repercussions; a mere slap on the wrist compared to the magnitude of the harm caused. The fines levied are often insignificant compared to the profits gained from selling dangerous products. This system effectively allows the wealthy to externalize the costs of their negligence onto the most vulnerable members of society. The poor pay the price in illness and even death, while the wealthy pay small fines.
The argument for dismantling these regulatory agencies is fundamentally flawed. It ignores the historical context, the ongoing need for protection, and the stark reality of what happens when businesses are allowed to operate without constraint. It’s a dangerous gamble, one that puts profit above the health and well-being of millions. Remember the food pyramid? That’s a product of these safety regulations.
The systematic dismantling of these agencies is not an accident; it is a deliberate and calculated effort. Replacing experienced professionals with individuals solely intent on dismantling crucial safety protocols is reckless. This isn’t just about ideology; it’s about survival. We are actively witnessing the weakening of the nation’s ability to protect its citizens.
So, yes, it’s easy to forget the reasons why we have agencies like the FDA. Their effectiveness makes their existence seem redundant. But the truth is, the reason we don’t constantly see widespread illness and death isn’t because it’s simply not happening, but because these agencies are working. Without them, the consequences would be catastrophic. Remembering the past, understanding the present, and working to protect the future necessitates strong and effective government agencies working to ensure our safety.