Nearly 900 economists, including two Nobel laureates, have signed a letter condemning President Trump’s tariff policies as “misguided” and a potential cause of recession. The letter argues that these tariffs, based on flawed economic reasoning, contradict principles of liberty and will harm American workers through price increases. Signatories, representing a range of political viewpoints, criticize the administration’s “reciprocal” tariffs as economically unsound. Despite current volatility, the letter expresses hope that sound economic principles will ultimately prevail.

Read the original article here

A group of top economists is circulating a letter that unequivocally states President Trump’s tariffs lack any basis in economic reality. This isn’t just the opinion of a few disgruntled academics; the letter boasts an impressive number of signatories, including prominent figures and even Nobel laureates. The sheer weight of this expert consensus highlights the serious concerns surrounding the administration’s trade policies.

The economists’ central argument revolves around the fundamentally flawed premise underlying the tariffs. They contend that the administration’s justification for these measures, often framed as a means of economic liberation, is demonstrably incorrect. Instead, the letter argues that the tariffs distort free market principles, risking significant economic harm.

The letter specifically criticizes the administration’s use of “reciprocal” tariffs, highlighting the formula used as erroneous and improvised. This isn’t a subtle criticism; the economists explicitly state that the formula used has no grounding in economic theory or established practice. This lack of a sound economic basis raises serious questions about the potential consequences of these policies.

Beyond the technical critique of the tariff formula, the letter also expresses concern about the broader economic repercussions. The signatories foresee potential negative impacts on American workers, predicting increased prices and the risk of a self-inflicted recession. This is a significant warning, emphasizing the potential for substantial harm to the U.S. economy.

This isn’t the first time the administration’s trade policies have been met with criticism from economists. For years, there has been significant pushback against the administration’s back-and-forth approach to tariffs, characterized by abrupt changes in policy and a lack of long-term strategic coherence. This inconsistent approach has already created volatility in the stock and bond markets, reflecting the uncertainty and anxiety surrounding these trade disputes.

The letter also serves as a reminder of the historical precedent surrounding protectionist measures. The economists explicitly warn against protectionist mythologies, suggesting that the current administration’s policies are ignoring crucial lessons from history. This is not merely a theoretical discussion; it is a warning based on empirical evidence and historical experience.

The letter is not merely a technical critique; it’s a clear statement about the potential for self-inflicted economic damage. The economists directly link the tariffs to the risks of increased prices and the possibility of a recession. This is not a hypothetical scenario; it’s a serious projection of possible outcomes with significant economic consequences.

Interestingly, the letter’s authors remain optimistic that sound economic principles and evidence will ultimately prevail. This suggests a belief in the power of rational discourse and the potential for a course correction in policy. However, this optimism is tempered by the urgency of the situation, highlighting the need for swift action to mitigate the potential harm.

The circulating letter, therefore, serves as a significant intervention in the ongoing debate surrounding President Trump’s trade policies. The letter not only offers a detailed critique of the underlying economic rationale but also underscores the potential for widespread economic harm. It’s a stark warning from a group of highly respected experts, and its implications for the future of the U.S. economy should not be taken lightly.

The fact that such a large number of distinguished economists are united in their condemnation of the President’s policies should be a cause for serious consideration. Their collective expertise points to a fundamental flaw in the administration’s trade strategy, underscoring the need for a more evidence-based approach. The letter serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of informed policymaking and the potential costs of disregarding expert advice. The economists’ assessment, devoid of partisan politics, serves as a crucial reality check in a time of heightened economic uncertainty.