By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following President Trump’s softened stance on the U.S.-China trade war and expression of optimism for a deal, China’s foreign ministry spokesperson stated their willingness to engage in talks. This shift in tone, coupled with comments from U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent suggesting a de-escalation, positively impacted global markets, which saw significant gains. While Trump maintains high tariffs on Chinese imports, the potential for de-escalation has eased recession fears. Further progress remains dependent on ongoing negotiations and future statements from both sides.
Read the original article here
China’s response to Trump’s softening stance on trade reveals a calculated strategy built on patience and a clear understanding of leverage. The perception from China seems to be one of amused observation, almost paternalistic in its tone, viewing the previous trade actions as a childish tantrum. The belief that the US, under Trump’s leadership, engaged in a poorly conceived and ultimately ineffective strategy is prevalent. This strategy, they argue, alienated allies while simultaneously provoking economic warfare against the world’s largest manufacturer, inadvertently generating sympathy for China amongst some international players.
The lack of tangible gains from the US’s aggressive tariff approach is a recurring theme. Instead of achieving its aims, the US reportedly experienced economic downturn, global animosity, and the disruption of established trade relationships. China appears confident that its own economic resilience far surpasses that of the US, allowing it to weather the storm of a trade war more effectively. The inherent differences in governance styles are highlighted: while the US government faces public scrutiny and accountability, the CCP is not subject to the same level of immediate pressure.
China’s apparent strategy hinges on making the US remove all previously imposed tariffs before even beginning negotiations. This suggests a belief that the US has little to offer, and any concession would be at China’s discretion. The suggestion that the US “gained nothing” from the trade war underscores this view. The focus shifts from the actual tariffs to a broader narrative of the US’s perceived incompetence in negotiation and the overall failure of the “art of the deal” approach.
Many observers, both pro and anti-China, agree that the trade war ultimately benefitted China more than the US. The US, it is argued, emerged weaker economically and diplomatically, while China maintained its position and even strengthened it by identifying and exploiting weaknesses in the US’s approach. The narrative consistently highlights Trump’s perceived lack of skill in negotiation, portraying him as easily manipulated and ultimately unsuccessful in achieving his goals.
The overall sentiment paints a picture of China as a shrewd and patient player, content to wait out the US’s aggressive actions. The comparison of Trump’s actions to those of a toddler throwing a tantrum, while certainly harsh, underscores the perception of a lack of strategic foresight and effective leadership on the US side. The perceived “folding” of the US administration, resulting in little to no tangible achievements, is viewed as a victory for China’s patient and calculated strategy.
The suggestion that any future negotiations must include a sincere apology from Trump further emphasizes China’s unyielding stance and a desire for the US to acknowledge its failures. This seemingly deliberate humiliation further showcases the perceived power dynamic and the resounding defeat of the US’s economic and diplomatic approach. This ultimately paints a picture where China’s position is strengthened, not weakened, by the perceived failures of Trump’s trade war. The emphasis on China’s long-term planning and preparedness, juxtaposed with the apparent short-sightedness and impulsiveness of the US strategy, drives home the point of China’s decisive advantage.
The absence of significant American gains from the “trade war” remains a central point. While the long-term economic consequences are still unfolding, the immediate outcome is interpreted as a clear victory for China, demonstrating the power of strategic patience and calculated decision-making in the face of impulsive and poorly conceived actions. The conclusion is that, from China’s perspective, the US’s aggressive trade tactics have ultimately backfired.