By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A new Angus Reid Institute study reveals significant shifts in Canadian consumer behavior. Seventy-six percent of Canadians report boycotting American products, while 61% are cancelling or delaying U.S. trips. Concurrently, 86% are increasing their purchases of Canadian goods. These trends indicate a substantial decrease in cross-border travel and spending, mirroring levels last seen during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Read the original article here
Seventy-six percent of Canadians claiming to boycott American products represents a significant shift in consumer behavior, driven by a complex interplay of political, economic, and social factors. This widespread rejection of American goods isn’t merely a fleeting trend; it reflects a deeply felt sense of national identity and a rejection of what many perceive as disrespectful and threatening actions by the United States.
The sentiment is not limited to specific policies, such as tariffs, though these certainly contribute to the negative perception. Instead, the boycott appears to stem from a broader feeling of betrayal and disregard for Canadian sovereignty, fueled by perceived bullying tactics and inconsistent behavior from the U.S. government. The perceived lack of trust in American assurances underscores the depth of the issue. Canadians feel a profound sense of being undervalued and even exploited, creating a strong incentive to actively seek alternatives to American products and services.
This mass boycott is far-reaching, impacting various sectors. Canadians are actively choosing Canadian-made goods across the board, from groceries and everyday household items to automobiles and even entertainment services. Travel plans to the United States are being cancelled en masse, significantly impacting the American tourism industry. This consumer shift is far from superficial; it signifies a long-term commitment to supporting domestic industries and reinforcing a strong sense of national pride and self-reliance.
The economic impact of this boycott is undeniable. While some sectors remain dominated by American companies due to monopolistic or oligopolistic structures, the reduced purchases translate into a noticeable decline in American revenue and employment. The scale of the boycott suggests a substantial effect, with anecdotal evidence pointing to significant increases in the cost of groceries as consumers opt for pricier Canadian alternatives. This willingness to shoulder increased costs to participate in the boycott further illustrates the strength of the movement.
The boycott extends beyond consumer goods. Canadians are unsubscribing from American streaming services, opting for domestic or international alternatives. This significant shift in entertainment consumption contributes to the overall economic impact, highlighting the deep commitment to the boycott across diverse aspects of daily life. The widespread nature of the boycott indicates a potent and sustained shift in the Canadian market.
Moreover, this large-scale boycott has galvanized Canadians in an unprecedented way. A collective sense of unity and resilience has emerged from this shared experience, solidifying national identity and showcasing the power of collective action. Even those who previously held differing political views have come together under the banner of protecting Canadian interests. The strength and depth of this unity are striking and point to the profound nature of the underlying grievance.
It is important to consider that this movement transcends simple economics. The boycott is driven by a profound sense of national pride and a desire to reclaim agency and control. This deeper emotional aspect of the boycott ensures its continued strength and potentially its enduring nature, even if political relations were to improve. The emotional weight of the issue may even surpass the financial cost of supporting domestic products.
The 76% figure, while striking, might even underestimate the true extent of the boycott. Anecdotal accounts suggest an even higher participation rate among those directly involved in the movement, underscoring the depth and breadth of this societal shift. Even those who remain uncommitted actively look for Canadian-made alternatives, further illustrating the enduring nature of this trend. The boycott seems to be deeply ingrained, and a shift in sentiment would likely require more than a simple reversal of policies.
The consequences of this boycott are likely to be felt far beyond the immediate economic repercussions. The shift in consumer behavior represents a lasting change in the relationship between Canada and the United States, highlighting the importance of respectful and equitable relationships between nations. This boycott serves as a powerful example of how consumer action can translate into significant geopolitical impact. The long-term implications of this sustained movement are yet to be fully realized, yet the lasting impact is unmistakable.