A Leger Marketing survey reveals that Canadians view their relationship with the U.S. as equally poor as that with Russia, with only 16% rating it positively. Conversely, Canadians express significantly more positive views towards Mexico and surprisingly, even China (36%). This negative perception of the U.S. is largely attributed to the Trump administration’s actions impacting Canadian sovereignty and the economy. The survey highlights a potential shift in Canadian foreign policy, suggesting a willingness to strengthen ties with Mexico and explore opportunities for collaboration with China, despite concerns about China’s autocratic nature.

Read the original article here

The recent survey indicating that Canadians view their relationship with the United States as equally problematic as their relationship with Russia is a striking revelation, yet not entirely unexpected. Canadians, understandably, held higher expectations for their closest ally, a nation with which they share extensive historical ties and geographical proximity. The current state of affairs, however, suggests a significant erosion of trust and goodwill.

This perception isn’t unique to Canada. Other nations, like Denmark, which have historically maintained strong pro-US stances, are also expressing similar concerns. The perception of threats, whether economic or military, from the US, similar to those posed by Russia, fundamentally alters the dynamics of the relationship. This sentiment is particularly acute when considering the significant support and advantageous agreements provided to the US over the years, only to be met with perceived threats and actions perceived as undermining national sovereignty.

The economic ramifications of this strained relationship are also becoming increasingly apparent. The survey’s suggestion of an openness to improved relations with China and Mexico reflects a desire for diversification and reduced reliance on a seemingly unreliable US partner. This isn’t merely about shifting trade patterns; it points to a deeper dissatisfaction with the US’s long-standing role in influencing and potentially hindering Canada’s economic ties with other nations. Allegations of decades of US manipulation of Canadian trade with China, acting as a middleman to extract profit while simultaneously discouraging direct Canadian-Chinese trade relationships, illustrate the extent of these concerns. This perceived economic manipulation is seen not just as unfair, but as a form of subtle, yet pervasive, annexation.

The deterioration of the US-Canada relationship isn’t solely an economic issue; it’s deeply rooted in political and geopolitical realities. The parallels drawn between the US’s actions and those of Russia are compelling. Both nations have demonstrated a willingness to engage in actions perceived as aggressive and threatening to their neighbors, challenging the previously established norms of international cooperation and respect for national sovereignty. The comparison is not about moral equivalence, but rather a reflection of the perceived threat level posed by both nations to Canadian interests.

The perceived unpredictability of US actions further exacerbates these anxieties. While Russia’s actions might be considered consistent with its authoritarian nature, the perceived inconsistency and unpredictability of the US’s actions—the shifts in policy and rhetoric—leaves Canada feeling increasingly vulnerable and uncertain about the future of the relationship. This is in stark contrast to the longstanding assumption of a stable and predictable partnership based on shared values and mutual respect. The past actions of the US government, coupled with current trends, have eroded this confidence, leading to a reassessment of its reliability as an ally.

This shift in Canadian perception isn’t simply a matter of temporary disagreement; it reflects a profound disillusionment. The comparison to Russia is not an endorsement of Russia’s actions, but rather a stark assessment of the current state of affairs with the US. The impact on Canada’s national security is a central concern, prompting discussions about increasing defense preparedness and exploring alternative alliances. This underscores the severity of the situation and the need for a fundamental recalibration of the relationship.

The future of the US-Canada relationship remains uncertain, but the survey’s findings serve as a significant wake-up call. They highlight the urgent need for both countries to engage in open and honest dialogue to address the underlying concerns and rebuild the trust that has been so severely damaged. Failing to do so will further strain the relationship and have potentially dire consequences for both nations. The urgency of this situation can’t be overstated, and the path toward reconciliation requires a significant shift in approach and understanding from both sides.