By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Shopping Trends team operates independently from CTV News journalists. This team’s recommendations may result in commission earnings through affiliate links. For further transparency regarding our operations, please refer to our “About Us” section.
Read the original article here
China’s recent proposal to partner with Canada against perceived American “bullying” presents a complex and potentially risky proposition for Canada. The suggestion itself highlights the shifting geopolitical landscape, where traditional alliances are being reevaluated in the face of escalating trade tensions and differing approaches to international relations.
The timing of this proposal is noteworthy, particularly given the current strained relationship between the US and China, as well as the existing tensions between China and Canada. The backdrop of US trade policies, which have been described as “bullying” by some, creates an opening for China to offer an alternative partnership. However, accepting this offer would require careful consideration of China’s own actions and intentions.
Concerns exist regarding China’s human rights record and its authoritarian government. The discovery of secret Chinese police stations on Canadian soil, along with allegations of election interference and threats against Canadian citizens, raise serious questions about China’s respect for Canadian sovereignty and its commitment to fair play in international relations. These actions are hardly consistent with the image of a trustworthy partner.
Further complicating the situation are historical events, such as the detention of Michael Spavor and Michael Kovrig, which highlighted China’s willingness to use Canadian citizens as bargaining chips. This incident underscores the potential risks of aligning with a nation that operates outside established norms of international conduct and demonstrates little regard for the rule of law when it serves its own interests.
While economic opportunities with China are undeniably attractive, a partnership based solely on shared animosity towards the US carries significant inherent dangers. Such an alliance risks compromising Canada’s own values and interests. Canada might find itself entangled in a strategic competition that could have unforeseen and potentially harmful consequences. The suggestion of a partnership overlooks the fact that China, despite its rhetoric, isn’t exactly a paragon of fair play either.
The allure of economic benefits from closer ties with China shouldn’t overshadow the potential risks. Canada needs to weigh the short-term gains against the potential long-term costs, particularly concerning its national sovereignty and its alignment with democratic principles. Diversifying trade relations is prudent, but choosing partners based solely on opposition to another nation is a flawed strategy. It could lead to a situation where Canada finds itself trading one form of influence for another, potentially worse, form of influence.
Furthermore, a closer examination of the current global economic situation reveals a more intricate dynamic than simply framing the issue as a binary choice between the US and China. The current state of affairs, with high tariffs and trade disputes, is arguably a direct result of past policy decisions. This complexity is often overlooked in the simplistic narrative of “bullying” and “partnership.” Canada, therefore, needs to approach any new alliance with a clear-eyed assessment of its potential benefits and drawbacks.
In conclusion, while China’s offer of partnership might seem tempting in the face of perceived US “bullying,” Canada needs to proceed with caution and conduct a thorough risk assessment. The long-term implications of aligning with China, given its track record, must be carefully weighed against any potential short-term economic advantages. A balanced approach prioritizing Canada’s national interests and upholding its values will be crucial in navigating this complex geopolitical landscape. Simply choosing the “lesser of two evils” without fully understanding the consequences could prove disastrous.