By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Australia’s promised donation of 59 retired M1A1 Abrams tanks to Ukraine is significantly delayed, despite being announced over six months ago as part of a $245 million aid package. The holdup stems from a lack of final US export approval, complicated by concerns regarding logistical challenges and the tanks’ age and vulnerability. While the Australian Department of Defence maintains the delivery is on track for 2025, internal sources express doubts about the transfer’s feasibility, citing potential peace negotiations and the lack of necessary personnel for sea transport. Australia remains committed to supporting Ukraine with over $1.5 billion in aid.
Read the original article here
A fleet of aging army tanks donated to Australia by the US, destined for Ukraine, remains grounded in Australia. The delay isn’t simply a logistical hurdle; it appears to be entangled in a complex web of international politics and permissions. The situation underscores the significant reliance Australia has on the US for international military logistics, highlighting a potential vulnerability in its defense capabilities.
The tanks in question, while described as “aging,” are actually M1A1 Abrams tanks, a variant still significantly more advanced than much of Russia’s current arsenal. These aren’t obsolete relics; they’re capable machines, even if they’re not the very latest models. The claim that they’re unsuitable for the modern drone warfare environment overlooks their adaptability and the potential for upgrades.
Some argue that the tanks’ vulnerability to drone attacks, specifically to the rear turret housing ammunition, is a major concern. While this is a valid point – the turret’s design makes it susceptible to top-down attacks – Ukrainian forces have demonstrated methods to mitigate this vulnerability with added armor. The issue isn’t necessarily the tanks’ inherent weakness, but rather the necessity of adapting them to the modern battlefield.
The delay, however, isn’t solely about the tanks’ capabilities. It seems there are significant bureaucratic hurdles involving US export permissions. The US’s control over the transfer of military equipment, stemming from International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), presents a major bottleneck. This isn’t simply a matter of logistics; it’s a political decision with significant implications for Australia’s relationship with both the US and Ukraine.
The comments suggest a growing frustration with the US’s perceived inaction. There’s a feeling that Australia is being held hostage to US political considerations, leaving Ukraine waiting for critical support. Some suggest that Australia should circumvent the US and directly ship the tanks, potentially incurring trade penalties or other repercussions.
The notion of simply sending the tanks to Poland as spares is floated as a compromise, allowing them to contribute in some capacity even if not directly deployed to the frontlines. This highlights the potential value of the tanks, even as potentially outdated models, for maintenance and repair of active Ukrainian forces.
The discussion also touches on the broader context of military aid to Ukraine, raising questions about the nature and quality of equipment being provided. Concerns are raised that the Western allies are primarily supplying older, less modern equipment, rather than the cutting-edge systems that might be more effective against Russia’s forces.
The current situation appears to be a stalemate, highlighting the complexities of international military cooperation and the political intricacies that can overshadow even urgent humanitarian needs. The delay in sending the tanks has sparked debate about the US’s role in the conflict, Australia’s military autonomy, and the ultimate effectiveness of the equipment being provided to Ukraine. The longer the delay persists, the more these questions will loom large.