By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Russia claims to have retaken several villages in the Kursk region, while Ukraine asserts that its forces are still resisting and that Russia is fabricating its claims to prolong the war. Zelenskyy accuses Putin of lying about the ground situation and delaying a ceasefire to gain a stronger military advantage before negotiations. Western leaders, including Starmer and Macron, agree that Russia is escalating conflict and not genuinely seeking peace, urging continued pressure. Meanwhile, recent attacks by both sides continued, with Ukraine reporting the downing of numerous drones and Russia citing damage from a drone strike.
Read the original article here
Zelenskyy accuses Putin of orchestrating a drawn-out conflict, fueled by a significant military buildup. This isn’t just a continuation of the invasion; it’s a strategic maneuver designed to perpetuate the war, potentially even beyond Ukraine’s borders. The current situation benefits Putin in ways he likely never anticipated.
The war’s prolongation is economically advantageous for Russia, creating a war economy that would collapse if hostilities ceased. Ending the conflict would mean the dismantling of this profitable system, making peace economically unsustainable for Putin’s regime. This explains Putin’s increasingly aggressive posturing, including his recent adoption of a military uniform – a blatant display of intent to continue the conflict.
The perception of this prolonged war within NATO is also advantageous to Putin. The conflict is creating deep divisions within the alliance, sowing discord between the US and Europe, and weakening the overall unity of the West. This fracturing of the NATO alliance plays directly into Putin’s hands, weakening the collective response to his aggression.
Putin’s strategy seemingly hinges on the premise that a prolonged war will force concessions from Ukraine and its allies. He is likely banking on the fatigue of the international community and the potential for internal political shifts in Western nations to negotiate a peace agreement beneficial to Russia. This agreement, however, may come at the terrible cost of Ukrainian land and autonomy.
This calculated strategy isn’t solely focused on military might. Putin is also using the conflict to achieve geopolitical objectives. He is aiming for a multipolar world order where strongman rule is normalized, and Western influence is diminished. This ambition is in line with broader goals shared with other authoritarian regimes, such as China. The potential collapse of the post-1990 security architecture in Eastern Europe, a direct consequence of prolonged conflict and potential Western appeasement, is a significant strategic win for Putin and his allies.
Furthermore, the current situation leaves Putin in a powerful negotiating position. He can either pursue a lengthy war, further depleting the West’s resources and resolve, or accept a peace treaty that involves significant territorial concessions from Ukraine, leaving it vulnerable to future Russian aggression. Either scenario presents a victory for Putin. He is playing a long game, and the consequences for Ukraine and its allies are severe.
The current state of affairs reinforces fears in smaller nations that rely on NATO’s collective security guarantees. There’s a growing concern that the West’s response to a future conflict could be weakened, leading to a sense of vulnerability and increased risk of further Russian aggression towards other nations. This worry is particularly acute in countries that border Russia, or that have a shared history of conflict with Russia. This concern is not unfounded; the ongoing conflict highlights the challenges faced by the international community in responding effectively to state-sponsored aggression.
It is crucial to recognize the gravity of this situation. Putin’s actions represent a clear threat to international stability, and the international community must respond decisively to prevent further escalation. The current situation highlights the urgent need for a strong, unified response from the West, one that prioritizes the defense of Ukraine and the security of its allies. Failure to do so risks exacerbating the conflict and empowering authoritarian regimes.
The long-term consequences of a protracted war are immense, affecting not only the immediate geopolitical landscape but also the broader international order. It is a complex situation requiring a nuanced and decisive response from the international community, one that accounts for both short-term and long-term risks. The ongoing crisis demands sustained attention and a commitment to long-term strategies to ensure peace and stability in the region. It’s imperative that the West develops a comprehensive approach that incorporates diplomatic, economic, and military measures to effectively counter Russian aggression and prevent further escalation.