By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following a Jeddah summit where a 30-day ceasefire was proposed, Ukraine expressed its commitment to peace and a swift resolution, contingent upon Russian reciprocation. However, Russia, prioritizing a long-term settlement, has yet to offer a substantive response, leading Ukraine to accuse Russia of deliberately prolonging the conflict. The United States is actively involved, offering to oversee a truce, and engaging in diplomatic efforts with Russia to secure a ceasefire. Despite these efforts, Russia’s recent battlefield gains and perceived strategic advantage suggest a low probability of immediate agreement.
Read the original article here
Russia’s apparent desire to prolong the war in Ukraine is becoming increasingly clear, fueled by a lack of a decisive response to proposed ceasefires. This inaction, perceived as a failure to address the core issues driving the conflict, allows Russia to maintain its strategic advantages and potentially dictate the terms of any future peace agreement.
The current situation reflects a pattern of Russia’s dishonest actions. Their past behavior, such as downplaying military buildups before the invasion, foreshadowed their current tactics. This makes any negotiation difficult, as their intentions seem less focused on genuine peace and more on gaining concessions through drawn-out talks.
Putin’s masterful manipulation is evident here. He skillfully uses protracted negotiations to extract more favorable terms for Russia, essentially exploiting any potential weakness to prolong the conflict. His approach highlights a willingness to sacrifice time for incremental territorial gains or strategic advantages.
This strategy takes advantage of any wavering commitment from external actors. Any perceived weakness or hesitation in the international community’s response emboldens Russia, allowing them to push for more concessions or simply delay a resolution to the conflict.
Ukraine, meanwhile, faces a challenging situation. Internal weaknesses, potentially exacerbated by inconsistent external support, leave them vulnerable to Russian pressure. The ongoing conflict severely impacts their ability to rebuild and recover.
For Ukraine, a ceasefire without achieving their stated goals – particularly regaining the 1991 borders – is unacceptable. This unwavering commitment makes a negotiated settlement incredibly difficult, as it clashes directly with Russia’s objectives. Their desire to inflict maximum damage on Russia’s military capabilities further complicates peace negotiations.
The international community’s response is also under scrutiny. The lack of a clear and united approach toward Russia opens space for exploitation. A lack of strong and consistent support for Ukraine, or any perceived appeasement, could embolden Russia. Conversely, strong and decisive action could deter Russia from further aggression.
Russia’s economic situation plays a crucial role. While a war-time economy temporarily supports their operations, a sudden cessation of hostilities could destabilize the Russian economy significantly. The prospect of widespread economic hardship post-war provides an incentive for Russia to prolong the conflict.
The human cost is immense. The ongoing conflict continues to take a devastating toll on both sides. Russia faces the challenging task of justifying these losses to their population, making a sudden end to the war politically costly.
Outside influence and potential meddling in the process also have the potential to complicate the situation. The involvement of external actors beyond Ukraine and Russia can create competing interests and complicate the resolution process, further prolonging the conflict. This dynamic underscores the complex interplay between domestic and international factors affecting the war.
Attempts to mediate a ceasefire could inadvertently empower Russia’s stalling tactics. If poorly structured, these attempts might inadvertently provide Russia with leverage. This risk highlights the need for careful strategy and coordinated international action. A strong, unified front may discourage Russia from using stalling tactics as a means to achieve their goals.
Ultimately, the path to peace requires a coordinated effort that addresses the underlying issues driving the conflict and counters Russia’s strategy. A resolution must safeguard Ukraine’s sovereignty and long-term security while also taking into account the economic realities facing Russia, ensuring a stable and sustainable outcome for the entire region. Until a robust and decisive counter-strategy is implemented, Russia will likely continue to stall and prolong the war.