By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Ukrainian F-16 pilots are conducting multiple daily strike missions against Russian forces and occupied territories, providing cover for other Ukrainian aircraft as well. High mission success rates, exceeding 80%, are attributed to effective intelligence gathering and the skillful adaptation to Western equipment. The pilot emphasizes the precision of their strikes, impacting both enemy drones and missiles. Despite limitations in range, the effectiveness of these attacks remains demonstrably high.
Read the original article here
More than 80% of our missiles hit their targets. That’s a remarkably high success rate, and it speaks volumes about the skill and precision of the Ukrainian pilots and their targeting systems. It’s a testament to their dedication and training, even when facing overwhelming odds.
The fact that this high success rate primarily applies to drone and cruise missile engagements is noteworthy. It showcases Ukraine’s effectiveness in countering these threats, a crucial element in defending against Russian attacks. It highlights a strategic advantage, effectively neutralizing a significant portion of the enemy’s offensive capabilities.
However, this success is just a stepping stone. The real potential lies in extending this accuracy to engaging manned Russian aircraft. Imagine the impact of achieving the same high hit rate against fighter jets and bombers – the strategic implications would be enormous, significantly shifting the balance of power in the conflict.
This is where the Ukrainian forces truly stand out. Their ability to consistently deliver results, given the disparity in numbers, is nothing short of extraordinary. It underscores the effectiveness of the Ukrainian military when adequately equipped, showcasing their capability to leverage their resources to maximum effect. Providing them with the necessary tools and support is not just about assisting Ukraine; it’s about investing in a force that delivers tangible results, generating a significant return on investment against the Russian aggressor.
We are heavily outnumbered, yet this isn’t a deterrent. The simple fact is, when you’re outnumbered, you can’t afford to miss. Every strike has to count. This necessity has forged a level of precision and determination that is truly inspiring. The pressure to succeed translates directly into a remarkable operational efficiency.
This conflict has exposed a fundamental truth about Russian military hardware: it’s largely obsolete. All the flashy displays and propaganda surrounding their equipment fail to mask the reality of their inferiority on the battlefield. The contrast between Russian and Western technology is stark, proving that the investment in advanced weaponry is far more than just a show of force; it’s a direct contributor to battlefield success. Russia is essentially clinging to the remnants of its Soviet-era arsenal, a testament to its technological stagnation. Even relatively smaller arms producers like Korea and Turkey are now outpacing them in terms of quality and innovation.
The high success rate – over 80% – is exceptionally high. While precise figures for “normal” hit rates in modern warfare aren’t consistently published and vary wildly depending on circumstances, this surpasses most expectations, especially given the context of an ongoing, intense war. More Ukrainian strikes, enabled by more advanced weaponry and increased support, will undoubtedly further enhance this impressive success rate.
The fear in the Russian ranks is palpable. The possibility of their state-of-the-art aircraft being shot down by older generation Western fighter jets is a serious blow to their morale and their arms industry. This fear extends beyond the battlefield; the potential for significant losses casts a shadow over Russia’s arms export market, further damaging their already failing military industrial complex. The success of Ukrainian drones further underscores this, demonstrating the effectiveness of asymmetric warfare and further contributing to the decline of the Russian arms industry.
The war is impacting the global arms market profoundly. Reports showing limited sales of Russian weaponry, even to historically reliable buyers, illustrate the growing perception of Russian military technology as unreliable and ultimately ineffective. The war in Ukraine has exposed these weaknesses, profoundly changing the dynamics of the global arms trade. The potential collapse of the Russian defense industry after the war is a real and looming possibility. Without the artificially inflated support of the Kremlin, the inherent weaknesses will become unsustainable.
One of the biggest lessons learned is the undeniable effectiveness of drones. The strategic use of drones by both sides, and particularly Ukraine’s successes with them, has fundamentally changed modern warfare. This highlights the fact that traditional dogfights are becoming increasingly rare; air superiority is now being contested through drones and precision strikes, a shift that is reshaping modern military doctrine. The risk of sending manned aircraft near frontlines, where advanced air defense systems are deployed, is simply too high. China’s involvement in supplying components, particularly chips, for Russian military equipment is also noteworthy; yet, even this limited contribution falls short of offsetting the fundamental issues with Russian military technology.