By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Ukrainian special forces successfully attacked the Engels-2 air base in Russia, detonating an ammunition depot and causing fires and explosions. This key Russian air base, located approximately 450 miles from Ukraine, is used to launch attacks against Ukraine using Tu-95 and Tu-160 bombers. The attack, the third on Engels-2 this year, occurred simultaneously with a large-scale Russian missile and drone barrage targeting central Ukraine. While the type of weapon used by Ukraine remains unconfirmed, Russian authorities reported a large-scale drone attack and subsequent civilian damage.
Read the original article here
Ukraine’s recent strike on the Engels-2 air base in Russia represents a significant development in the ongoing conflict. The attack, which reportedly caused fires and explosions, targeted a key facility responsible for launching devastating bomber attacks against Ukraine. The silence from the Russian side, a stark contrast to their usual immediate pronouncements about intercepted missiles or falling debris, suggests the severity of the damage inflicted. This lack of official Russian commentary speaks volumes.
The strategic importance of Engels-2 cannot be overstated. It serves as a crucial base for Tu-95 and Tu-160 bombers, long-range aircraft capable of carrying out significant attacks against Ukrainian targets. Striking this base directly disrupts Russia’s ability to launch these attacks, effectively hindering their offensive capabilities. The comparison to Barksdale Air Force Base in the United States, another strategic bomber base housing nuclear-capable aircraft, is apt, highlighting the significance of this target.
The aftermath of the strike reportedly caused considerable damage extending far beyond the immediate vicinity of the base. Reports indicate that the shockwave from the explosions shattered windows in a nearby kindergarten, resulting in injuries to at least one woman. While unfortunate collateral damage is regrettable, it’s crucial to contrast this with the deliberate targeting of Ukrainian civilians by Russian forces. The accidental nature of these injuries, however unfortunate, stands in stark contrast to the intentional targeting of civilian infrastructure and the widespread atrocities committed by Russian forces throughout the conflict.
The incident underscores the evolving nature of the conflict. Ukraine’s ability to strike deep into Russian territory highlights their growing capacity to target critical military installations. This capability, combined with Russia’s continued attacks on civilian targets, shows a significant asymmetry in the conflict’s tactics and objectives. While Ukraine strives to neutralize Russia’s offensive power by targeting military infrastructure, Russia persists in its brutal attacks against Ukrainian civilians. This represents a fundamental difference in approach that underscores the moral complexities of the war.
The attack on Engels-2 also took place in the context of a proposed ceasefire, further highlighting the conflicting narratives of the conflict. While a ceasefire had supposedly been agreed upon, focusing on the protection of energy infrastructure, Russia almost immediately violated this agreement by launching drone strikes against Kropyvnytskyi, a major Ukrainian city. This violation renders any pretense of a ceasefire null and void, contextualizing Ukraine’s subsequent attack on a legitimate military target. Essentially, Ukraine’s actions came in direct response to Russia’s earlier violation of what could be only described as a very short-lived ceasefire.
The sheer scale of the explosions at Engels-2 suggests a significant impact on Russia’s military capabilities. The amount of explosives detonated points to the successful targeting of a substantial stockpile, further diminishing Russia’s ability to sustain its offensive operations. This suggests a strategic weakening of Russia’s capacity to launch large-scale attacks from this vital airbase. The success of this strike, along with others of a similar nature, suggests a pattern of escalating Ukrainian effectiveness in disrupting Russian military operations.
The contrast between the responses to civilian casualties on both sides is also noteworthy. While Ukrainian officials have expressed regret over the unintentional injuries caused by the Engels-2 strike, Russia’s disregard for civilian life in Ukraine is well-documented and widely condemned. This stark difference further underscores the asymmetry in the conflict, highlighting the fundamentally different approaches and priorities of the warring parties. The difference is one of accident versus deliberate malice, a critical distinction in judging the morality of the actions taken.
In conclusion, the attack on Engels-2 marks a significant turning point in the conflict. It demonstrates Ukraine’s increasing capacity to target strategically important Russian military assets deep within its territory, while simultaneously revealing the stark contrast between the approaches of both sides to the war and its resulting civilian casualties. The attack’s success has undoubtedly dealt a blow to Russia’s ability to sustain offensive operations, and may represent a shift in the strategic balance of the war.