By John Q. Hosedrinker 
This article is protected by copyright and is the property of Fortune Media IP Limited. Its use is governed by their Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The FORTUNE trademark is registered, and the site may contain affiliate links. Finally, offers and information are subject to change.
Read the original article here
Trump’s job cuts at the IRS are having a devastating impact on the agency’s ability to conduct audits, potentially resulting in tens of billions of dollars in lost revenue for the government. This is directly undermining the Biden administration’s efforts to increase IRS staffing and pursue tax evasion cases against high-income individuals and corporations.
The significant reduction in IRS personnel, stemming from Trump’s government-wide cuts, is forcing the agency to put numerous large-scale audits on hold. This means billions of dollars in owed taxes may never be collected. The situation is further exacerbated by a hiring freeze, preventing the agency from quickly filling the vacant positions.
Even more concerning is the fact that Congress has effectively reversed the increased IRS enforcement spending approved in 2022. This leaves the IRS with severely limited resources and makes it increasingly difficult to fulfill its mission of tax collection and enforcement. This situation directly contradicts the widely understood concept of government efficiency and sound financial management.
The impact of these cuts extends far beyond the immediate loss of revenue. Reports indicate that audits of high-net-worth individuals have already been dropped without any resulting tax payments. Additionally, long-running audits of corporations have been hastily settled for significantly reduced amounts due to the departure of experienced IRS agents.
The situation presents a stark contrast to the stated aims of fiscal responsibility. The argument that “running the government like a business” should result in increased revenue is demonstrably false in this context. Instead, these cuts appear to prioritize the interests of wealthy individuals and corporations at the expense of the public good.
It’s a cynical strategy that seems designed to shield the wealthy and well-connected from tax scrutiny, while simultaneously hindering the agency’s ability to collect taxes from those less capable of avoiding audits. The decreased capacity to pursue high-profile cases means the burden of tax collection disproportionately falls on those with fewer resources to navigate the complex tax system.
The Treasury Secretary’s statement about reviewing priorities within the IRS rings hollow given the actual effect of the cuts. Prioritizing “collections, privacy, and customer service” is impossible when crucial auditing personnel are cut, rendering the agency far less effective in all three areas. The focus on collection is hampered by the lack of auditors, privacy is potentially compromised by an overburdened and understaffed agency, and customer service suffers due to the reduced workforce.
The lack of Senate hearings for the Trump-appointed IRS head further suggests a disregard for transparency and accountability. This lack of oversight allows the detrimental effects of these cuts to proceed unchecked. The entire situation points to a deliberate dismantling of effective tax enforcement mechanisms, favoring those with the financial means to avoid full tax compliance.
This deliberate weakening of the IRS stands in stark contrast to the stated goals of fiscal conservatism. Instead of generating revenue, these cuts create a significant loss, exacerbating the national debt while enriching those least likely to contribute their fair share. This situation undermines the very foundation of a fair and equitable tax system, benefitting only a select few at the expense of the public fisc.
The reduction in IRS staff leads to an overall weakening of government efficiency, impacting not only tax collection but also various crucial services. The long-term effects are significant, possibly including increased unemployment, worsened mental health outcomes, greater reliance on social assistance, and higher crime rates. It’s a vicious cycle where decreased government capacity leads to increased societal problems, further straining public resources and exacerbating inequality.
The potential for tens of billions of dollars in lost revenue is not merely a theoretical possibility; it’s a foreseeable and direct consequence of deliberate policy decisions. This situation raises serious concerns about the prioritization of political agendas over sound fiscal management and the erosion of essential government functions. The resulting impact on the country’s financial well-being will be significant and long-lasting.