By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump has ordered the Pentagon to develop plans for potentially reclaiming the Panama Canal, including the use of military force. These plans, being drafted by SOUTHCOM, range from increased cooperation with Panama’s military to a full-scale invasion. The likelihood of invasion hinges on Panama’s level of cooperation, and the move is ostensibly to enhance U.S. economic security, despite Panama’s and others’ objections. This action follows Trump’s repeated threats and mischaracterizations of the canal’s operations.
Read the original article here
A report alleging that Donald Trump ordered the US military to plan an invasion of Panama to seize the Panama Canal is deeply unsettling. The sheer audacity of such an action, especially considering his past campaign rhetoric, is staggering. He ran on a platform of peace, criticizing his opponents for allegedly warmongering tendencies, yet this reported order directly contradicts that image.
The strategic implications of seizing the canal are questionable at best. The canal’s narrow sections are easily vulnerable to sabotage. A relatively small act of resistance, such as sinking a few ships, could easily shut down the canal for extended periods, rendering any military victory pointless. This potential for disruption highlights the shortsightedness of such a plan.
The international repercussions of such an invasion would be catastrophic. The global community would likely condemn this action as a blatant act of aggression. The UN would undoubtedly be involved, and the diplomatic fallout could be immense, creating far more problems than it would solve. It is hard to imagine a scenario where forcibly seizing the canal benefits the United States in any meaningful way.
The timing of this alleged order is particularly alarming. It suggests a pattern of erratic and unpredictable behavior from the former president. The potential for such a reckless action to escalate into a larger conflict is very real, given the current global geopolitical climate. The possibility of a significant military conflict is not theoretical; it’s a realistic outcome of such a rash decision.
The lack of apparent outrage from certain segments of the population is equally disturbing. The normalization of such potentially aggressive behavior is a troubling trend. One would expect an uproar if a previous administration had allegedly made such a plan; however, it seems that this level of blatant disregard for international law and human life is becoming accepted.
The domestic political implications are also worth noting. A decision of this magnitude should be a matter of extensive debate and congressional approval. It is the responsibility of Congress, not the president alone, to declare war or authorize military invasions. This alleged bypassing of Congress points to an attempt to circumvent democratic processes, underscoring the gravity of the situation.
This alleged order should not be taken lightly. Even if considered “saber rattling,” the potential for catastrophic consequences demands a serious response. The very possibility of a US-led invasion of Panama based solely on the whim of a former president should be a source of deep concern for everyone. We must question whether our systems of checks and balances are capable of preventing such reckless actions in the future.
The economic rationale for such a move is also incredibly weak. The cost of a military invasion, coupled with the potential for long-term damage to US international relations and the canal itself, vastly outweighs any possible economic gains. This highlights the potential for personal gain to drive such a dangerous and ultimately self-destructive act.
Finally, the moral implications are undeniable. An invasion of a sovereign nation would result in countless deaths and immeasurable suffering. This underscores the fact that such an action is not merely a political or economic matter, but a deeply immoral one, with potentially devastating consequences for the United States and the world. The human cost of this reckless gamble is simply too high to contemplate lightly.
The report of a planned invasion of Panama should serve as a stark reminder of the potential dangers of unchecked power and the importance of vigilance in maintaining global stability and peace. It is a situation demanding immediate and serious attention from all those invested in preventing further escalation. The world is watching, and the consequences of such actions could reverberate for decades to come.