By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following online criticism, J.D. Vance deleted his social media post about being chased by a “mob.” The post, which described a confrontation with protestors, has been widely disputed. Claims of a chase have been denied by witnesses. Vance’s account now shows no evidence of the described incident. This action follows increasing scrutiny surrounding the politician’s account of the event.
Read the original article here
Trump’s recent economic policies, particularly his tariffs, have seemingly caused a ripple of discontent even within his usual circles of support, notably Fox News. The market’s downturn, readily apparent to most observers, has become a point of contention, prompting some unexpected pushback against the former president.
The claim that the economy is thriving, a common refrain from Trump’s supporters, is increasingly difficult to reconcile with the reality of declining market trends. The assertion that it’s all fine, simply dismissing concerns as unfounded, appears tone-deaf given the evident economic anxieties. Many now openly express skepticism regarding these pronouncements, particularly considering that the very mechanism of tariffs is to increase prices, thereby impacting consumer spending and overall economic health.
The situation highlights a growing disconnect between Trump’s pronouncements and the perceived reality. It is becoming increasingly evident that a significant portion of the population is experiencing economic hardship, contradicting the claims of a robust and thriving economy. This economic unease is being attributed, at least partially, to Trump’s erratic economic policies.
The implication that any economic downturn is automatically someone else’s fault, specifically assigning blame to President Biden, feels increasingly strained as the evidence mounts against this narrative. Shifting blame becomes less convincing when objective indicators suggest the issues are deeply rooted in prior economic policies. A concerted effort to divert attention from the consequences of the past administration’s actions feels transparent to many.
Even Fox News, a typically strong ally, has shown signs of unease, albeit somewhat subtly. Initially downplaying the impact of the tariffs, and attempting to shift the blame, they seem to be walking a tightrope, acknowledging the economic downturn without explicitly criticizing Trump’s role. This measured response, a departure from their typical unwavering support, may indicate an underlying shift in sentiment, reflecting a growing recognition of the economic consequences of the tariffs.
The growing dissent, even from traditionally loyal sources, highlights the severity of the situation. The fact that even Fox News seems hesitant to fully endorse Trump’s narrative suggests a growing realization that the economic problems are more significant than previously acknowledged. The attempted shifting of blame appears increasingly unconvincing in the face of widespread economic anxieties.
The economic decline, according to many, is directly linked to a multitude of factors, including consumer nervousness caused by Trump’s erratic behavior. This anxiety translates directly into reduced consumer spending, exacerbating the negative economic cycle. The inability or unwillingness to acknowledge responsibility for these negative consequences only serves to further erode public trust.
Furthermore, the suggestion that Trump is strategically driving down the markets for personal gain, enabling him and his wealthy associates to profit from subsequent market rebounds, raises serious ethical concerns. Such a scenario, while speculative, highlights the potential for abuse of power and the disregard for the economic wellbeing of the average citizen. This idea of a “long con” involving market manipulation amplifies the existing concerns and mistrust surrounding his economic policies.
The pushback from previously loyal sources and the increasing anxieties within the general population are clear signs that ignoring the market’s downturn is no longer a viable strategy. The economic fallout, once dismissed as inconsequential, is now gaining widespread attention, and the attempts to deflect responsibility are increasingly being met with skepticism and outrage. The situation calls for a more transparent and responsible approach to economic policy, one which acknowledges the impact of past decisions and seeks to remedy the damage caused. Ignoring the reality of the market downturn, and attributing the blame to others, is no longer sustainable.