By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following the revelation that a journalist was mistakenly added to a Signal group chat with national security officials, investigations are underway. The White House, National Security Council, and Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency will collaborate on the technical aspects of the investigation. National Security Advisor Mike Waltz accepted responsibility for the error, though the circumstances remain unclear. A federal lawsuit targets five cabinet members involved, alleging violations of federal law due to the use of Signal for official communications, while the White House denies the exchange of classified information.
Read the original article here
Trump appointing Elon Musk, his self-proclaimed “first buddy” and head of the Dogecoin cryptocurrency, to investigate the Signal messaging app security breach is certainly a head-scratcher. The sheer audacity of the situation is almost comical, a bizarre twist in a long-running saga of questionable decisions.
This isn’t about whether a journalist was added to a group chat; that’s a distraction. The real issue is that high-ranking officials, including members of the national security apparatus, were using a non-secure platform like Signal to discuss highly classified information. This is a blatant disregard for security protocols and a potential violation of numerous laws, including those regarding the handling of sensitive government data. The focus needs to remain on the criminal negligence displayed by those officials, not the mechanics of how a journalist might have gained access to the chat.
The choice of Elon Musk is equally perplexing. While Musk possesses significant technical expertise, his appointment raises serious questions. His lack of relevant security clearance, coupled with his unpredictable behavior and close ties to Trump, cast considerable doubt on the impartiality and efficacy of such an investigation. It feels more like a PR stunt designed to deflect blame and obfuscate the gravity of the situation.
The initial reactions suggest a concerted effort to shift the blame. The narrative is already spinning toward portraying the journalist as the culprit, rather than focusing on the culpability of the officials who jeopardized national security. This is a classic deflection tactic, typical of those seeking to avoid accountability. This attempted whitewash cannot be allowed to succeed.
This entire scenario reeks of a desperate attempt to control the narrative and bury the truth. The focus should be on the criminal negligence displayed by the high-level officials who endangered national security by using an insecure messaging platform. The supposed investigation, led by a highly controversial and unqualified figure, appears designed to do nothing more than create confusion and deflect attention.
The idea of Musk, with his self-proclaimed tech expertise, bringing in his team to “hack” whatever logs they can find to shift blame is particularly troubling. This suggests a blatant disregard for due process and a potential effort to manipulate evidence to fit a pre-determined narrative. This raises serious concerns about the integrity of any “investigation” he might conduct.
The casual use of the term “blunder” to describe the leak is infuriatingly dismissive. This wasn’t an accidental slip-up; it was a deliberate choice to conduct sensitive discussions on an insecure platform. The implications of such disregard for security are far too serious to be swept under the rug with such a weak and inappropriate descriptor.
It’s alarming that this level of incompetence and disregard for national security is being met with such apparent nonchalance. The lack of accountability is astounding. Ignoring the core issue—the use of an insecure communication platform for sensitive discussions—and focusing instead on a secondary detail like the journalist’s presence in the chat is absurd.
The public deserves a thorough and impartial investigation, led by individuals with appropriate qualifications and security clearances. This charade involving Musk is unacceptable and only serves to further erode public trust in government. The focus must remain on those responsible for jeopardizing national security, and they must be held accountable for their actions, regardless of any attempts at distraction. This isn’t about a “blunder;” it’s about a criminal act with potentially catastrophic consequences. The American people deserve better than this.