By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Journalist Craig Unger asserts that former U.S. President Donald Trump is a Russian asset, citing evidence spanning decades. Unger points to Trump’s early business dealings with KGB-linked entities, his 1987 Moscow trip, and subsequent actions undermining Western alliances as key indicators. These actions, Unger argues, demonstrate a pattern of behavior consistent with a long-term cultivation of Trump as a Russian asset, beginning in the 1980s. He dismisses claims of conspiracy, highlighting verifiable evidence detailed in his two books. Unger’s conviction stems from a confluence of these factors, culminating in Trump’s actions damaging U.S. intelligence relationships and alliances.
Read the original article here
Trump’s repeated praise of Putin, his tendency to side with Russia during his first term, and his expressed desire for dictatorial powers similar to Putin’s strongly suggest a deeply concerning relationship. The notion that this is mere coincidence seems increasingly illogical. The sheer volume of evidence points towards a far more sinister explanation.
His recent comments about knowing Putin for a “long time” and his inability to disrespect him during negotiations further fuel these suspicions. This suggests a level of personal connection and obligation that transcends ordinary diplomacy. This isn’t just a matter of political alignment; it speaks to a much deeper entanglement.
The ongoing “loyalty purge” within the administration and military adds another layer of complexity. This deliberate removal of dissenting voices creates an environment ripe for manipulation and control, reinforcing the perception of a president acting in the interests of a foreign power. It makes it easier to exert influence without opposition.
The comparison of Trump’s administration to a “clown car” of amateurs, easily manipulated by Putin’s strategic machinations, rings unsettlingly true. The observation that Putin’s ultimate aim is to manage the decline of US hegemony while making Russia “great again” at America’s expense, with Trump as his tool, is a chillingly plausible assessment. This isn’t a matter of opinion, but a calculated strategy by a seasoned geopolitical player.
The ease with which Trump seemingly surrenders power to the Republican Congress, combined with his disregard for court rulings, paints a picture of a leader actively dismantling democratic checks and balances. The lack of effective opposition from within the government only exacerbates the situation. It’s a gradual, almost imperceptible slide towards authoritarianism.
It is difficult to dismiss the accusations of unwitting collaboration. The evidence is too substantial, too consistent, and too concerning to ignore. The argument for unwitting complicity fails to account for the sheer volume of overtly pro-Russia actions and statements, not just from Trump himself, but from those within his inner circle.
The involvement of smarter, more articulate individuals like JD Vance and Marco Rubio raises additional alarm. Their ability to effectively communicate Trump’s often-incoherent pro-Russia rhetoric gives a level of credibility and sophistication to his actions that he himself often lacks. The calculated use of fear-mongering and disinformation mirrors tactics used by authoritarian regimes. This sophisticated level of manipulation cannot be simply accidental.
The suggestion that Trump and Putin are working together to, in essence, divide the world, while extreme, can’t be entirely dismissed. The alternative — that Putin is merely using Trump as a pawn — is equally plausible, but equally concerning. Either scenario presents a grave threat to global stability and the very fabric of American democracy.
The numerous legal cases, sanctions, and indictments related to Russian interference in the 2016 election, coupled with the sharing of classified information with Russian representatives, further underscore the severity of the situation. This is not a conspiracy theory, but a collection of documented facts and verifiable actions that paint a consistent narrative.
The question of Trump’s culpability – whether witting or unwitting – almost misses the bigger point. The impact is the same, regardless. The damage to American national security and global stability is profound, and the potential consequences for the future are far-reaching. The potential damage inflicted from Trump’s actions both during and after his presidency is potentially catastrophic.
The constant comparisons to Benedict Arnold are apt. The betrayal of trust, the erosion of democratic processes, and the potential for lasting damage to international relationships are all undeniable. The scale and long-term implications of this betrayal are potentially catastrophic. It leaves us wondering whether a country founded on ideals of freedom and democracy is able to withstand such a devastating assault on its very core values.