By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s “Fighting Oligarchy” rally in Denver, Colorado, drew over 34,000 attendees, surpassing previous records for both lawmakers. The rally, echoing similar events in Arizona and Greeley, Colorado (which drew 11,000), focused on combating the influence of billionaires and corporations on American politics and the rise of authoritarianism. Both Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez emphasized the need for unity among working people to resist these trends. The event’s significant turnout suggests a growing movement against economic inequality and the perceived threat to democracy.
Read the original article here
The sheer scale of the rally in Denver, drawing an estimated 34,000 attendees, was undeniably impressive. It marked a career high for both Sanders and AOC, exceeding any previous gathering they’d held. The event, organized to combat what was described as a rising oligarchy and authoritarianism, clearly resonated deeply with a substantial segment of the population. This level of engagement outside of a traditional election cycle, and without significant mainstream media promotion beforehand, speaks volumes about the public’s yearning for change and their willingness to actively participate in the fight for it.
The rally’s significance extends beyond its impressive attendance. The very fact that such a large crowd assembled to oppose the perceived threat of oligarchy and authoritarianism highlights a growing unease and distrust in established political systems. It suggests a widespread recognition that fundamental changes are necessary to address the widening economic inequality and erosion of democratic principles. The energy and passion displayed by the attendees cannot be ignored; it represents a potent force that could potentially reshape the political landscape.
The rally’s success raises important questions about the Democratic Party’s strategy and its ability to effectively engage with its base. The overwhelming support for Sanders and AOC, figures often perceived as representing a more progressive wing of the party, underscores the potential disconnect between the party establishment and its increasingly energized and mobilized grassroots. The failure of mainstream media to adequately cover the rally also highlights the inherent biases and limitations within the traditional news ecosystem. One could argue this only serves to further empower alternative forms of information dissemination and mobilization.
The rally’s impact, however, remains a subject of ongoing debate. While the sheer size of the crowd is inspiring, the question of whether it will translate into tangible political change remains open. The concern that this enthusiasm might be confined to a pre-existing base of supporters, rather than encompassing a broader spectrum of the electorate, is valid. It’s crucial to reach beyond the committed base, effectively engaging those who feel disenfranchised or apathetic towards the political process. The rally, therefore, should be seen not as an end in itself, but as a significant starting point in a much longer and more complex struggle.
Despite potential limitations, the Denver rally undoubtedly represents a powerful demonstration of public sentiment. It signifies a growing resistance to what many perceive as an increasingly authoritarian and oligarchic system. The organizers’ commitment to actively confronting these challenges is commendable and serves as a catalyst for future action. The rally’s message – that the American people will fight back against these threats – resonated strongly, and the sheer scale of the gathering provides ample reason for optimism. Such widespread participation indicates a potential for a significant shift in the political landscape, provided this energy is channeled effectively.
The crucial next step is translating this impressive demonstration of support into a concrete political strategy. The emphasis on “fighting back” and winning suggests a planned and coordinated approach, which needs to evolve beyond rallies and into effective, targeted action. This will necessitate a carefully planned, detailed program focusing on achievable goals, measurable objectives, and strategies to engage not just those already on board, but importantly, those on the fence or entirely disengaged from politics. The challenge will be to maintain momentum, channel this energy into effective political action, and overcome potential opposition from both establishment forces and those benefiting from the existing systems. The path forward requires a sophisticated strategy capable of sustained mobilization, converting passionate voices into political power capable of substantive reform.