By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A new RAND analysis reveals that $79 trillion has been transferred from the bottom 90% of Americans to the top 1% since 1975, driven by neoliberal policies since the 1970s. In 2023 alone, this redistribution totaled $3.9 trillion— enough to provide a $32,000 raise to every worker. This massive wealth transfer has significantly reduced the share of national income received by the bottom 90%, resulting in a median household income half of what it would have been under equitable income growth. Proposed tax cuts further threaten to exacerbate this inequality.
Read the original article here
The assertion that the wealthiest 1% have siphoned an astonishing $79 trillion from the bottom 90% since 1975 is a staggering claim. This figure represents a monumental transfer of wealth, effectively hollowing out the financial security of the vast majority of the population over nearly five decades. The sheer scale of this alleged wealth extraction is difficult to comprehend, underscoring a deeply ingrained systemic imbalance.
This long-term trend of wealth concentration hasn’t slowed. In fact, the year 2023 alone witnessed an alleged $3.9 trillion siphoned from the bottom 90%. This colossal sum, if redistributed, would be enough to provide every worker in the country with a $32,000 raise. Imagine the transformative impact of such a significant increase in income on individual lives and communities across the nation. The potential to alleviate financial strain, improve living standards, and boost overall economic activity is undeniable.
The implications of this alleged wealth transfer extend far beyond individual finances. It fuels economic inequality, contributing to a widening gap between the rich and the poor. This disparity erodes social cohesion, fostering resentment and undermining the very fabric of a just and equitable society. The concentration of wealth in the hands of a select few raises questions about the fairness and effectiveness of the current economic system.
The $79 trillion figure, more than double the US national deficit, underscores the magnitude of the alleged problem. It highlights the possibility that a significant portion of the national debt could be attributed to this massive transfer of wealth, rather than solely government spending or other traditional explanations. This perspective challenges conventional understanding of the nation’s financial situation and suggests a need for a thorough re-evaluation of fiscal policies.
The idea that this wealth extraction has occurred through what some might call a “tax cuts scam” further complicates the narrative. It suggests that deliberate policy decisions may have contributed significantly to this wealth imbalance. This interpretation raises critical questions about the role of government in regulating the economy and ensuring a more equitable distribution of resources. The accusation that “trickle-down economics” has instead facilitated this upward flow of wealth is a strong indictment of specific economic philosophies and their practical consequences.
The discussion inevitably leads to questions of fairness and justice. Many believe that a more equitable distribution of wealth is essential for a healthy and thriving society. The dramatic contrast between the median and mean net worth of households – $200,000 versus $1 million – underscores this inequality. A small percentage of extremely wealthy individuals dramatically skew the average, highlighting a systemic problem requiring attention and reform.
Examples of corporate practices like those employed by Walmart, where large corporations displace small businesses and suppress wages, further illustrate the mechanics of this alleged wealth transfer. Such practices highlight how large corporations, through various strategies, maximize profits while minimizing the compensation and benefits of their employees and communities. The alleged disregard for the long-term well-being of communities and the prioritization of shareholder profits raise concerns about ethical business practices and their social impact.
The debate extends beyond simple economics, touching upon the very nature of wealth accumulation and its societal consequences. The argument that hoarding massive amounts of wealth constitutes a form of terrorism is a provocative statement reflecting deep frustration with existing systems and their perceived failures. This argument frames the issue not merely as economic disparity, but as a form of societal harm requiring forceful intervention and systemic change.
The urgency of addressing this alleged economic disparity is palpable. The call for a “new people’s movement” is a testament to the widespread belief that current systems are failing ordinary citizens. The challenge is how to effectively mobilize and engage the population in a collective effort toward meaningful reform. Addressing the perceived failures of current political systems, and fostering a greater sense of shared responsibility is crucial to resolving this issue.