By John Q. Hosedrinker 
February witnessed the highest monthly destruction of Russian military vehicles since the invasion began, with Ukrainian forces eliminating over 3,472 vehicles and fuel tanks, along with hundreds of armored vehicles and tanks. Despite a decrease in ground combat engagements compared to January, Russian air strikes significantly increased. Heavy Russian losses, including an estimated 36,570 troops in February alone, suggest a high cost for minimal territorial gains in eastern Ukraine. This escalating equipment and personnel depletion has reportedly forced Russia to resort to using less protective equipment and civilian vehicles.
Read the original article here
Russian forces experienced record vehicle losses in February, marking the highest number of destroyed vehicles since the start of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The Ukrainian Defense Ministry reported the destruction of a staggering 3,472 vehicles and fuel tanks, a figure that includes 596 armored combat vehicles and 331 tanks. This represents a significant blow to Russia’s military capabilities, particularly considering it occurred within the shortest month of the year.
Despite a decrease in the number of combat clashes compared to the previous month – 3,274 in February versus 5,087 in January – the intensity of the conflict remained high. Russian aerial bombardment increased significantly, with over 3,500 guided bombs dropped on Ukrainian positions and settlements in February, a sharp rise from the approximately 2,400 in January. This suggests a shift in Russian tactics, perhaps reflecting a dwindling supply of effective ground forces and a reliance on air power to compensate.
The human cost for Russia has been equally devastating. The Ukrainian General Staff estimated that over 36,500 Russian troops were irretrievably lost during February. This staggering loss of life underscores the immense pressure on Russian forces and the severe challenges they face in sustaining their offensive. The overall losses since the start of the full-scale invasion, according to the Ukrainian General Staff, now reach a staggering 875,610 troops – a figure corroborated by Western intelligence assessments.
These substantial losses are further evidenced by the desperate measures taken by Russian commanders. Facing a critical shortage of military equipment, they have resorted to providing soldiers with less protective gear, and in some cases, even resorting to using civilian vehicles in attacks. This highlights the increasingly dire situation faced by the Russian military and its struggle to maintain its war effort.
The limited territorial gains achieved by Russia in eastern Ukraine and Kursk Oblast have been purchased at an exorbitant price, both in terms of personnel and material. The sheer volume of destroyed vehicles – thousands of trucks, armored vehicles, and tanks – reflects a significant depletion of Russia’s military hardware. This makes maintaining a sustained offensive increasingly difficult for Russia, further diminishing its ability to make further advances.
The scale of Russia’s losses is truly astonishing. Consider the immense industrial capacity of the Soviet Union, which for nearly 50 years produced vast quantities of military hardware, including hundreds of thousands of armored vehicles. Russia inherited a significant portion of this industrial legacy, yet in just three years of conflict, it has lost the majority of its inherited arsenal. This points to a massive failure in the Russian military’s logistical support, procurement and production capabilities. The depletion of reserves is so severe that reports indicate Russia is now drawing upon equipment from its post-World War II stockpiles, suggesting the situation is even more critical than initially thought.
The situation is further aggravated by the ongoing struggle to supply their forces adequately. Anecdotal reports speak of the utilization of non-military vehicles, including donkeys and even camels, for transport, highlighting the extreme scarcity of functional military transport. The reliance on these unconventional methods underscores the desperate state of Russia’s logistics and the difficulties in resupplying its front lines.
This massive loss of equipment and personnel significantly weakens Russia’s ability to wage war, making long-term sustainability of their military operations highly doubtful. The economic implications are equally severe, as the cost of this conflict is clearly beyond Russia’s capacity to bear. The long-term consequences for the Russian economy will likely be severe, with many experts predicting a significant economic collapse in the near future. The current trajectory suggests that the war will continue to negatively affect Russia, depleting its resources and ultimately jeopardizing the regime’s stability. This reality adds another layer of difficulty to their already challenging position on the battlefield.