By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Despite President Trump’s claims of a strong relationship with Vladimir Putin, Russia’s response to a proposed ceasefire was met with obfuscation and new demands unacceptable to Ukraine. Putin’s actions, while seemingly accepting the ceasefire in principle, appear designed to buy time and leverage future negotiations. This strategy aligns with Russia’s typical diplomatic playbook of prolonging talks to achieve its strategic goals. Trump’s optimism contrasts sharply with concerns from both experts and allies who view Russia’s actions as a stalling tactic.
Read the original article here
Putin’s stalling tactics regarding the US plan for Ukraine strongly suggest a calculated attempt to manipulate Trump. It’s a move that, unfortunately, seems likely to succeed, given their history. Zelenskyy’s acceptance of the US terms has essentially placed the onus on both Putin and Trump, and neither seems inclined to capitalize on the opportunity for a swift resolution. The blame, predictably, will likely be shifted onto Zelenskyy for perceived insufficient concessions to Putin.
This situation highlights a disturbing normalization of the idea that Ukraine should consider capitulation. It’s deeply troubling but, sadly, not unexpected. The entire scenario feels orchestrated, with Putin appearing to be pulling the strings. Trump’s actions seem entirely performative, awaiting further direction from Putin. The notion of a pre-planned strategy is undeniable; these are not isolated events.
The involvement of the EU and the flow of global capital into Europe’s war effort are significant factors. The shift of research and talent from the US to Asia and Europe due to the current US political climate further compounds the situation. This isn’t merely about playing Trump; it’s about exploiting the weakened state of the US to Russia’s advantage. Trump, despite claiming Putin’s respect, seems to lack the necessary cards to effectively negotiate. The idea that Putin “respects” Trump is, frankly, ludicrous. Trump is an obvious Russian asset, and their relationship is far deeper than a simple “playing” dynamic. They’re partners in a far broader, more sinister game.
The “great relationship” Trump boasts about with Putin raises serious concerns. Putin’s response to the US peace plan—a barrage of obfuscations and new demands—isn’t a rejection, but a calculated delay. He’s buying time, allowing his troops to gain ground before any ceasefire negotiation. He uses this time to strengthen his position and therefore his demands. His emphasis on addressing the “root causes” of the war is merely a smokescreen, a coded message for imposing Russian dominance and undermining Ukraine’s democracy. This behavior is consistent with Russia’s diplomatic playbook: exhausting negotiations designed to stall and gain leverage.
Trump’s eagerness for a quick resolution, driven perhaps by domestic political pressure, clashes starkly with Putin’s strategic maneuvering. Putin’s calculated delays could easily push Trump into making rash decisions, further jeopardizing the situation. The entire process appears to be designed to erode trust in the US, both domestically and internationally.
The notion that Putin is merely “playing” Trump is an understatement. It’s more akin to puppeteering. Putin uses Trump’s vanity and desire for recognition to manipulate the situation. The eventual outcome might involve destabilizing the US, damaging its relationships with allies, and ultimately leaving Trump politically exposed and discarded once his usefulness is over. This is not a game of chess; it’s a well-orchestrated power play that has catastrophic implications for Ukraine and potentially the entire world. The sheer absurdity of continuing to view these two individuals as anything other than collaborators actively working against the US and its interests is staggering. The long-term strategy seems to be the utter destruction of the American political fabric and international standing.