By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Portugal’s planned acquisition of the F-35 fighter jet has been cancelled due to concerns over the unpredictable nature of the US administration under the Trump presidency and its impact on NATO alliances. The high acquisition and operational costs of the F-35, coupled with potential threats of reduced US support, also contributed to this decision. While the F-35 was initially preferred, Portugal is now exploring alternative European fighter jet options, such as the Rafale, Typhoon, and Gripen, with any new aircraft unlikely to enter service before the next decade.
Read the original article here
Portugal’s decision to explore European fighter jet options instead of the American F-35 represents a significant shift in international defense procurement. This move, driven by concerns over the reliability and stability of US foreign policy, highlights a growing unease among some NATO allies regarding their dependence on American military technology and partnerships.
The F-35 had initially been favored by Portugal, as a seemingly logical upgrade from their aging fleet of F-16s. However, the recent volatility in US foreign policy, characterized by sudden shifts and reversals, has eroded confidence in the US as a consistently dependable partner. This has forced Portugal’s Ministry of Defense to re-evaluate its options, leading to a prioritization of European-made alternatives.
This reassessment isn’t solely about the immediate cost of the F-35, though the reported $82 million price tag per aircraft, coupled with exorbitant hourly and maintenance costs, certainly plays a significant role. The potential for US interference in the operational capabilities of the aircraft, fueled by reports of a “back-door off switch,” further contributes to the apprehension. This is coupled with the additional fear of the US cutting off access to crucial software updates or even network systems like Link-16.
The shift away from the F-35 opens the door for European defense contractors. This is seen as potentially boosting the economies of countries like France and Sweden, which manufacture the Rafale and Gripen fighter jets, respectively. The Gripen, in particular, is touted for its effectiveness against Russian aircraft, a critical consideration given the ongoing geopolitical tensions in Europe. This opportunity for European manufacturers might also lead to increased production and innovation within the European defense sector.
The impact on the US defense industry is substantial. Losing a major international sale like Portugal’s fighter jet procurement means a direct loss of revenue, but the ramifications extend beyond simple financial losses. The high cost of the F-35 program means fewer jets for the US military itself, limiting its capabilities and potentially diverting funds from other essential areas. This could also drive up the cost of the F-35 even further for future buyers, creating a vicious cycle.
Portugal’s decision is not an isolated incident. The concerns regarding the US’s reliability as an ally are shared by other countries, potentially sparking a broader reassessment of military procurement strategies throughout Europe. This creates an opportunity for European nations to strengthen their collaborative efforts in defense technology, lessening their dependence on US equipment and fostering greater autonomy within NATO.
However, the transition isn’t without challenges. The integration of new fighter jets necessitates significant adjustments to existing infrastructure, training programs, and interoperability with NATO partners. While the short-term need for a quick replacement to Portugal’s older F-18s adds urgency, careful evaluation of various European options is essential to ensure long-term compatibility and operational effectiveness.
The implications extend beyond military strategy. Portugal’s decision reflects a broader trend of shifting geopolitical alliances and economic relationships. The US’s actions have raised questions about its long-term commitment to international cooperation, potentially impacting trust among its allies and encouraging diversification of military partnerships and equipment sources. The current situation highlights the potential for significant shifts in global power dynamics, as countries re-evaluate their strategic alliances and seek greater control over their own defense capabilities.
Portugal’s decision to forgo the F-35 and instead look to European partners is more than a simple weapons procurement choice; it’s a statement about international relations, economic stability and the evolving landscape of global defense. It serves as a compelling example of how shifting geopolitical realities can force even staunch allies to reconsider their priorities and seek alternative solutions. The long-term consequences of this shift remain to be seen, but it undoubtedly marks a turning point in the European defense industry and the transatlantic relationship.