By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Contrary to reports, President Trump did not actually fire any Federal Trade Commission commissioners. His actions constituted a public declaration of his *desired* power to remove them, a power he legally lacks. News coverage of this event, and of Trump’s broader economic plans, often misrepresents the situation, either downplaying the lack of substance in his pronouncements or accepting his claims at face value. This inaccurate portrayal ignores the underlying reality: Trump’s economic policies are driven by corruption and a lack of intellectual capacity.
Read the original article here
The media’s response to Trump’s actions is a colossal failure. The consistent downplaying of his autocratic tendencies, the relentless focus on manufactured controversies, and the overall normalization of his behavior are not just journalistic malpractice; they’re actively paving the path towards societal ruin. This isn’t about simple political bias; it’s about a systemic, possibly intentional, failure to adequately report on the grave threats to democracy.
The sheer volume of coverage dedicated to Trump, regardless of its accuracy or context, has created a perverse incentive for the media. The pursuit of clicks, views, and subscriptions has prioritized sensationalism over substance, resulting in a 24/7 news cycle fixated on a single, highly problematic figure. This constant attention, even if negative, has inadvertently amplified his influence and allowed him to dominate the political narrative. This is not responsible journalism; it’s a self-perpetuating cycle of sensationalized coverage that benefits no one except perhaps the media organizations themselves and the individuals they choose to promote.
This isn’t just about Trump himself; the underlying issue is the media’s disturbing capacity to normalize autocratic misrule. The reluctance to clearly label his actions as authoritarian, the constant attempts to “both sides” issues where there is no legitimate debate, and the general failure to provide context for his behavior are deeply concerning. The invocation of tired tropes – “legitimately elected”, “businessman and dealmaker” – to excuse egregious conduct is an alarming display of willful blindness. To suggest that because someone is “legitimately elected,” their actions are automatically above scrutiny ignores the very real possibility of a leader exploiting a system for personal gain. Such a view is not only naive, it’s dangerous. It echoes the dangerous comparisons to historical dictators like Hitler, a comparison dismissed too readily by establishment media despite alarming similarities.
The concentration of media ownership is a significant contributing factor. The fact that a handful of corporations control the vast majority of media outlets creates an inherent conflict of interest. Their profitability is tied to the status quo, and any significant criticism of the powerful could jeopardize their financial interests. This creates a powerful incentive to shy away from critical reporting, especially on those in power who might retaliate. This implicit censorship, coupled with the pressure to generate profit, has effectively silenced many voices of dissent and allowed for the widespread acceptance of disinformation.
The consequences of this journalistic failure are dire. The normalization of autocratic behavior undermines democratic norms and erodes public trust in institutions. When the media fails to hold power accountable, it creates an environment where authoritarianism can flourish. Citizens are left uninformed, unable to make informed decisions, and vulnerable to manipulation. This, in turn, leads to societal polarization, political instability, and ultimately, the erosion of democratic values. The failure to fully report on the dangers of the present, whether it is a clear and present danger to democracy or some other disaster, is a dereliction of duty.
The situation isn’t hopeless. There are independent media outlets and journalists who are working tirelessly to provide accurate and unbiased reporting. However, these voices are often drowned out by the mainstream media’s overwhelming focus on spectacle and sensationalism. The challenge lies in finding ways to amplify these voices and empower independent journalism so that it can effectively counteract the pervasive influence of mainstream media. This requires a conscious effort from citizens to seek out diverse sources of information, critically evaluate the news they consume, and demand higher standards of accountability from the media. Simply ignoring the mainstream narrative isn’t enough; actively seeking alternative sources and holding the media accountable for their shortcomings is essential to safeguard democracy and prevent further descent into chaos.