By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster asserts that President Trump’s Oval Office rebuke of Ukrainian President Zelenskyy, coupled with his recent pro-Russia stance, is a victory for Vladimir Putin. Trump’s actions, including initiating peace talks excluding Ukraine and echoing Putin’s grievances, significantly reduce pressure on Russia while increasing pressure on Ukraine. This aligns with Putin’s manipulative tactics, exploiting Trump’s sense of grievance to advance Russian interests. The resulting confusion among U.S. allies underscores the potential damage to the U.S. relationship with Ukraine and broader geopolitical stability.
Read the original article here
Putin couldn’t be happier about the recent meeting between Trump and Zelenskyy, a former national security advisor has stated. The advisor suggests this is because the meeting placed immense pressure on Zelenskyy and Ukraine, while leaving Putin unscathed. This imbalance of pressure, strategically engineered, is seen as a major victory for Putin.
The advisor highlights Putin’s manipulation of Trump, appealing to his sense of grievance and exploiting his susceptibility to flattery. This tactic, expertly deployed by a master manipulator and liar, according to the advisor, has yielded significant results. The advisor portrays Putin as someone who skillfully uses Trump’s vulnerabilities to achieve his strategic goals.
Trump’s apparent disregard for the potential negative consequences of his words, both domestically and internationally, is also a point of concern. The advisor describes Trump’s actions as a series of blows aimed directly at weakening Ukraine’s resolve, potentially impacting their will to continue fighting. The potential repercussions of these actions for the international standing of the United States are significant and deserve careful consideration.
This calculated undermining of Ukraine, as explained by the advisor, represents a significant win for Putin. The meeting’s impact on the alliance supporting Ukraine is of great concern, with the potential to significantly weaken its cohesion and effectiveness.
The advisor points out that Trump’s comments about the origins of the war and its resolution, seemingly aligned with Putin’s narrative, are a damaging blow to the US’s global standing. These comments undermine the international consensus regarding the conflict, fostering division and potentially emboldening Russia. The advisor feels that the overall result is disastrous for the global stability that the US helped to support.
The advisor posits that the presence of a Russian reporter at the White House meeting suggests a degree of orchestration, casting doubt on the spontaneity of the event. This lends credence to the suggestion that the entire meeting was a carefully planned affair, designed to achieve specific goals beneficial to Putin.
The advisor predicts Putin’s next move involves Trump easing sanctions on Russia, thereby providing much-needed financial support for the ongoing war effort. This strategy, it’s suggested, will likely involve a gradual process, starting with Trump downplaying the negative effects of sanctions on the United States and culminating in their partial removal. The advisor views this as a deliberate strategy to rescue Russia’s struggling economy and boost Putin’s political standing.
The advisor expresses alarm at Trump’s actions, describing them as a transparent attempt to dismantle American values and foreign policy principles. The advisor fears that the slow and insidious nature of this process, similar to boiling a frog, is allowing the degradation to occur without sufficient resistance or awareness. The advisor suggests that the current situation is a result of a broader lack of resistance and engagement.
The advisor further highlights the perceived lack of response from certain Republican factions, enabling, if not encouraging, the unfolding events. The advisor points to the failure of what should be countervailing political forces to act decisively to stop the perceived erosion of American influence on the world stage. The advisor expresses significant disappointment in the lack of opposition and notes the concern of the weakening of American influence.
The advisor expresses their belief that this situation is the result of a long-term Russian plan to undermine the West. The advisor notes the perceived lack of response from political leaders and that the West is now actively playing into Russia’s hands. The advisor believes the actions and their outcome are a matter of deliberate and long-term planning.
The advisor warns of the dire consequences of inaction, foreseeing a potential escalation of the conflict with devastating consequences. The advisor paints a picture of a potential expansion of the war into neighboring regions, leading to a much larger conflict and economic crisis than what is currently seen. The advisor emphasizes the long-term damage to American international credibility and influence. The advisor expresses grave concern over the possible outcomes of the current path.
The advisor concludes with a sense of urgency and deep concern about the future, fearing that Putin is poised to achieve his strategic goals with Trump’s cooperation. The advisor points to what they see as a political and ethical failure of the American right and a complete negligence toward the potential disastrous outcome of inaction. The advisor believes this will lead to lasting damage to the United States and the global community.