By John Q. Hosedrinker 
To boost European defense production and reduce reliance on US weapons, President Macron proposed offering the SAMP/T air defense system as an alternative to the Patriot, and the Rafale fighter jet as an alternative to the F-35. This initiative follows recent European NATO members’ continued purchases of US-made aircraft, despite concerns. Macron also urged French defense companies to streamline processes for greater competitiveness. Furthermore, he outlined a plan for a multi-national European troop deployment to Ukraine focused on training and long-term support, while reiterating the unacceptability of Putin’s ceasefire conditions.
Read the original article here
Macron’s call for the EU to prioritize European purchases over American ones is a direct consequence of past US policies. The current state of transatlantic relations, characterized by distrust and strained trade partnerships, has pushed Europe towards self-reliance.
This shift in sentiment within the EU is fueled by a sense that past American actions haven’t fostered a reciprocal relationship. Instead of collaboration, the prevailing feeling seems to be that the US has behaved in a manner that undermines trust.
The suggestion to “stop buying American, buy European” is being viewed not only as a strategic economic move, but also as a reaction to perceived unfairness and unreliability in US trade practices. The desire for greater economic autonomy within the EU is increasingly prominent.
Macron’s statement is interpreted by many as a marketing tactic for French goods, particularly military equipment. This is seen as a legitimate strategy given the perceived quality and competitive pricing of French products compared to their American counterparts. The possibility of a less-dependent Europe on American military technology is gaining traction.
The idea of a more self-sufficient EU military is gaining support. Concerns over US control over defense technology and the potential for unilateral cutoff of supply have solidified this desire for independence. A self-reliant European defense sector is increasingly seen as necessary for strategic security.
This is also seen as a response to the overall tone of US foreign policy. The narrative suggests past US administrations have demonstrated a lack of respect for its European allies, opting for aggressive tactics instead of collaborative partnerships. Therefore, a move away from US goods and services is viewed as a strategic response to mend fractured alliances.
There’s a widespread belief that the US has created this situation through its own actions. The overall tone suggests a belief that the current situation is a direct result of the US’s previous administration’s decisions. The emphasis is on the need for the EU to take control of its own economic destiny.
However, completely eliminating American goods from the EU market is a complex challenge. While certain sectors, like food and wine, naturally favour European products, others, such as electronics, present more difficulties due to established supply chains. A gradual shift, rather than an immediate complete boycott, seems more likely.
The discussion extends beyond mere economics, encompassing broader geopolitical considerations. The relationship between the US and the EU is perceived as fundamentally altered, impacting everything from defense to food safety standards.
The call to buy European is not just an economic strategy, but also a political one. It’s seen as a way to demonstrate the EU’s ability to act independently and to build stronger internal alliances.
Ultimately, Macron’s call is seen as a reflection of a profound shift in transatlantic relations. It underscores a growing preference within the EU for self-reliance and a reassessment of its relationship with the US. The focus is now on strengthening internal partnerships and creating a more resilient, independent European bloc.