By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Vice President Kamala Harris’s approval ratings, while initially higher than her disapproval ratings, consistently struggled to surpass 50 percent. In contrast, J.D. Vance’s favorability is even lower than Harris’s at a similar point in their respective terms, potentially the worst for a new vice president in polling history. This is particularly concerning given that vice presidents typically start with higher public approval. Vance’s low standing, coupled with a lack of Trump’s endorsement and an unsustainable emulation of Trump’s divisive style, significantly hinders his presidential aspirations. His prospects are further challenged by the potential for a Trump dynasty and the likelihood that voters will seek a departure from Trumpism by 2028.
Read the original article here
J.D. Vance’s tenure as Vice President is generating a level of public disapproval rarely seen in American history. The intensity of the negative sentiment directed toward him surpasses expectations, even considering the often-contentious nature of modern politics. Many commentators express disbelief that his unpopularity overshadows even figures like Dick Cheney, who faced widespread criticism for his role in the Iraq War. This suggests a depth of negative feeling that extends beyond typical partisan divides.
J.D. Vance’s perceived lack of suitability for high office is a recurring theme. He’s portrayed not just as unpopular, but as incompetent, lacking the skills and temperament necessary for the job. The comments suggest a widespread sense that he is out of his depth, unable to handle the pressures and responsibilities of his position, leading to a sense of profound inadequacy.
The criticism extends beyond his perceived incompetence to encompass his character and personality. He’s frequently described with exceptionally harsh language, characterized as arrogant, smug, and even morally reprehensible. The depth of this disapproval surpasses simple political disagreement; it speaks to a fundamental lack of respect and trust from a broad segment of the population.
A striking aspect of the commentary is the almost complete lack of positive or neutral opinions about Vance’s performance. The near-universal negativity suggests a failure to connect with the public on any level. This lack of connection seems to transcend party lines, indicating that his unpopularity resonates far beyond partisan loyalties.
Even in comparison to other historically unpopular Vice Presidents, Vance’s situation appears unique. His critics frequently highlight the fact that the office of the Vice President is often a low-profile position, yet Vance seems to have actively cultivated a level of negative attention far exceeding what is typical. His actions and public persona appear to have amplified the already low public perception of the VP office.
The contrast with previous administrations is another point of focus. The perception is that unlike previous Vice Presidents, J.D. Vance actively seeks the spotlight and, in doing so, only exacerbates the negative attention. This is often interpreted as a self-serving pursuit of personal branding rather than a dedication to public service.
Some commentators draw parallels between Vance and historical figures, pointing to a perceived moral failing akin to Aaron Burr’s actions. While not directly comparing the two in terms of criminal acts, the overall assessment is a sense of deep distrust and disdain for his character and actions. This further contributes to the perception of him as a profoundly disliked public figure.
The level of intensity directed at Vance is remarkable. His actions and demeanor are seen as actively provoking anger and resentment, leading to a nearly universal condemnation of his character. This widespread disapproval paints a picture of a Vice President who has deeply alienated a significant portion of the population.
Furthermore, the comments suggest that Vance’s perceived weakness and lack of conviction are major contributors to his unpopularity. He is often portrayed as a “yes-man,” lacking the strength or conviction to stand up for what is right, further deepening the public’s negative assessment. This perceived weakness, coupled with his other flaws, solidifies his position as a highly disliked public figure.
Finally, there is a common thread throughout the commentary highlighting the almost incomprehensible scale of Vance’s unpopularity. Many feel a strong visceral reaction of dislike for him, exceeding simple political disagreements. This deeply negative reaction is seen as unprecedented for a Vice President in modern times. The consensus is that J.D. Vance’s standing is far below any previous Vice President, cementing his place in history as potentially the most disliked one ever.